Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » David Enterprises Inc. » DAV1776105285

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DAV1776105285)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-77
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident676 / 1000
Company LinkView David Enterprises Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERDAV1776105285
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames
INCIDENT DATE25/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of David Enterprises Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts David Enterprises Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the David Enterprises Inc. breach identified under incident ID DAV1776105285.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of David Enterprises Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/david-enterprises-inc, the number of followers: 79, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 15 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 676 with a difference of -77 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on David Enterprises Inc. and their customers.

On 10 April 2026, David Evans Enterprises Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "David Evans Enterprises Data Breach Exposes Nearly 9,000 Individuals".

David Evans Enterprises Inc., a Portland, Oregon-based civil engineering and consulting firm, disclosed a data breach affecting 8,915 individuals across the U.S., including four Maine residents.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, with nearly 8915 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 12 months of free credit monitoring and identity protection services through Cyberscout; enrollment required within 90 days of notification.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach occurred over a two-day period (February 26–27, 2026) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating civil engineering and consulting firm with potential public-facing systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating undetected for nearly a month suggests possible credential misuse. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating names were confirmed as part of the compromised information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 8,915 individuals and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfiltration method, but PII was exposed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of destruction, but breach suggests potential impact and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pII exposure implies potential unauthorized access/modification. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach undetected for nearly a month. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (50%)

Sources & References