Comparison Overview
Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer, CH
Last Update: 17/07/2026
Providing Cyber Threat Intelligence from the Dark Web & Clearnet: Breaches, Ransomware, Darknet Markets, Threat Alerts & more. Follow me on X: https://x.com/DarkWebInformer
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL
Last Update: 21/09/2026
## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. O...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Dark Web Informer
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Dark Web Informer has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.
Incident History - Dark Web Informer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dark Web Informer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Dark Web Informer
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.