DWI
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
darkwebinformer
Website:
Employees number:
10
Number of followers:
10,666
NAICS:
541514
Industry Type:
Homepage:
darkwebinformer.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
DAR_5551933
Scan Status:
In-progress
Dark Web Informer Company CyberSecurity Posture
darkwebinformer.com
Providing Cyber Threat Intelligence from the Dark Web & Clearnet: Breaches, Ransomware, Darknet Markets, Threat Alerts & more. Follow me on X: https://x.com/DarkWebInformer
Dark Web Informer A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
DWI Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 600 and 649
DWI
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
DWI Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
DWI
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
DWI Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
3
Logitech International S.A.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: On **November 14, 2025**, Logitech disclosed a cybersecurity breach stemming from a **zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882)** in Oracle E-Business Suite, exploited by the **Clop extortion gang** since July 2025. The attack led to **unauthorized data exfiltration** from Logitech’s internal IT systems, including **limited employee, consumer, customer, and supplier information**. While no **sensitive personal data** (e.g., national IDs, credit cards) was compromised, the breach exposed non-sensitive records, raising risks of **follow-on phishing or social engineering attacks**.Logitech confirmed **no operational disruption**—manufacturing, financials, and business continuity remained unaffected—thanks to **prompt detection, patching, and external cybersecurity support**. The incident was contained, with regulatory notifications filed and affected parties being assessed for disclosure. However, the breach underscores **third-party software risks** and the **evolving tactics of ransomware groups** shifting from encryption to **data theft-driven extortion**.Though Logitech downplayed material impact, the exposure of **internal and stakeholder data**—even if non-critical—highlights vulnerabilities in **supply chain security** and the need for **proactive zero-day defense strategies**. Regulatory scrutiny (e.g., GDPR) may apply if European consumer data was involved, though no fines were reported at disclosure.
Unnamed Cryptocurrency Victim (Washington, D.C.)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: A Washington, D.C.-based cryptocurrency holder fell victim to a **$230 million Bitcoin heist** (now valued at over **$384.5 million**) in August 2024, orchestrated by a cybercrime ring led by individuals like **Malone Lam (aka 'Greavys')** and **Jeandiel Serrano**. The attackers used **social engineering** to compromise the victim’s crypto accounts, transferring **4,100+ Bitcoin** into wallets under their control. The stolen funds were laundered via **crypto mixers, peel chains, pass-through wallets, and VPNs**, with some converted to **Monero** to obscure traces. Despite efforts to hide transactions, investigators linked the funds due to operational errors by the attackers. The group, comprising mostly **18- to 22-year-olds**, operated across the U.S. and abroad, leveraging online gaming friendships to expand their network. **Kunal Mehta (aka 'The Accountant')** played a key role in laundering, using **shell companies** to convert crypto to cash, charging a **10% fee** per transaction. The stolen funds financed **luxury purchases**, including **private jets, 28 high-end cars (worth up to $3.8M), designer goods, and international travel**. The attack involved **conspiracy to commit wire fraud, cyber-enabled racketeering, and money laundering**, with **14 suspects indicted** by the DOJ in May 2025. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in **cryptocurrency security**, particularly against **social engineering and phishing tactics**, with no evidence of ransomware or direct physical harm but severe **financial and reputational damage** to the victim.
Wing FTP Server
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-47812) in Wing FTP Server allows unauthenticated attackers to achieve complete server control. The vulnerability affects all versions up to 7.4.3 and has a maximum CVSSv4 score of 10.0. The flaw exploits improper NULL byte handling, enabling attackers to inject arbitrary Lua code and execute system commands with elevated privileges. This vulnerability's impact is particularly severe because Wing FTP Server typically runs with elevated privileges, resulting in complete administrative control over the affected server.
DWI Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for DWI
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)
Dark Web Informer has 325.53% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Dark Web Informer has 212.5% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types DWI vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Dark Web Informer reported 2 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — DWI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DWI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
DWI Company Subsidiaries
Providing Cyber Threat Intelligence from the Dark Web & Clearnet: Breaches, Ransomware, Darknet Markets, Threat Alerts & more. Follow me on X: https://x.com/DarkWebInformer
Loading...
DWI Similar Companies
Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest s
CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-clas
.png)
DWI CyberSecurity News
October 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Toys “R” Us Canada Hit by Data Breach Exposing Customer Info
Toys “R” Us Canada confirms data breach exposing customer names, emails, and phone numbers. Learn what happened and how to stay safe.
October 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Threat Actors Allegedly Selling Monolock Ransomware on Dark Web Forums
Monolock ransomware has surfaced in underground forums, with threat actors advertising version 1.0 for sale alongside stolen corporate...
June 02, 2025 07:00 AM
Hackers Allegedly Selling Windows Crypter Claims Bypass of All Antiviruses
Cybercriminal forums are witnessing the proliferation of sophisticated malware tools, with recent intelligence revealing the sale of a...
May 05, 2025 07:00 AM
SS7 0-Day Exploit Hits Dark Web Market with $5,000 Price Tag
The exploit package enables SMS hijacking, real-time phone tracking, and call interception through fundamental flaws in legacy telecom...
May 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Hackers Selling SS7 0-Day Vulnerability on Hacker Forums for $5000
A sophisticated SS7 protocol vulnerability that enables unauthorized SMS interception and real-time phone tracking is now being offered for sale on underground...
March 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Massive Data Breach? Over 100,000 Gemini Users Allegedly at Risk as Hacker Claims to Sell Personal Info
Over 100000 Gemini users' data is allegedly up for sale on the dark web. This could be one of the biggest crypto breaches yet!
March 26, 2025 06:06 PM
B1ack’s Stash Hackers Plan to Leak 4 Million Stolen Credit Card Details for Free
In a significant development in the cybercriminal underworld, B1ack's Stash, a notorious dark web carding marketplace.
March 17, 2025 07:00 AM
KD Panels Reportedly Targeted by Crazyhunter Ransomware Attack
KD Panels, a manufacturing firm specializing in industrial control systems, has reportedly become the latest victim of the Crazyhunter ransomware group.
March 14, 2025 07:00 AM
Harrell’s, LLC Targeted in Latest LYNX Ransomware Breach
Harrell's, LLC has become the latest victim of the Lynx ransomware group, with attackers leaking unredacted screenshots.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
DWI CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Dark Web Informer
The official website of Dark Web Informer is https://www.darkwebinformer.com.
Dark Web Informer’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 649, reflecting their Poor security posture.
How many security badges does Dark Web Informer’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Dark Web Informer have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Dark Web Informer have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Dark Web Informer comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Dark Web Informer have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Dark Web Informer comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Dark Web Informer is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Dark Web Informer have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Dark Web Informer is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer operates primarily in the Computer and Network Security industry.
Number of Employees at Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer employs approximately 10 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Dark Web Informer’s LinkedIn Followers
Dark Web Informer’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 10,666 followers.
NAICS Classification of Dark Web Informer
Dark Web Informer is classified under the NAICS code 541514, which corresponds to Others.
Dark Web Informer’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Dark Web Informer does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Dark Web Informer’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Dark Web Informer maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/darkwebinformer.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Dark Web Informer
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Dark Web Informer has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Dark Web Informer has an estimated 2,928 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Dark Web Informer ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability, Cyber Attack and Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Dark Web Informer ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $230 million.
How does Dark Web Informer detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with update to version 7.4.4, and remediation measures with review anonymous access configurations, and enhanced monitoring with implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, and and third party assistance with external cybersecurity firms (unnamed), and containment measures with prompt detection, containment measures with vulnerability patching (post-oracle fix), containment measures with engagement of external experts, and remediation measures with investigation, remediation measures with assessment of affected parties, remediation measures with regulatory notifications, and communication strategy with public disclosure (sec filings, press releases), communication strategy with stakeholder notifications, communication strategy with transparency reports, and and third party assistance with fbi cyber division, third party assistance with doj criminal division, third party assistance with cryptocurrency forensics firms (e.g., chainalysis), and and containment measures with asset freezing (crypto wallets), containment measures with shell company investigations, containment measures with arrests (14 indicted), and remediation measures with victim restitution efforts, remediation measures with public advisories on social engineering risks, and recovery measures with seizure of luxury assets (cars, properties), recovery measures with blockchain tracing to recover funds, and communication strategy with doj press releases, communication strategy with fbi public warnings, communication strategy with media interviews, and enhanced monitoring with blockchain analysis for peel chains, enhanced monitoring with vpn/ip tracking..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Critical RCE Vulnerability in Wing FTP Server (CVE-2025-47812)
Description: A newly disclosed critical vulnerability in Wing FTP Server has been assigned CVE-2025-47812 with a maximum CVSSv4 score of 10.0, allowing unauthenticated attackers to achieve complete server control.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-05-14
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: NULL byte injection in /loginok.html endpoint
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-47812
Motivation: Complete server takeover with root/SYSTEM privileges
Title: Logitech Data Breach via Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business Suite
Description: Logitech International S.A. disclosed a cybersecurity incident on November 14, 2025, involving a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, exploited by the Clop extortion gang. The breach led to the exfiltration of internal data, including limited employee, consumer, customer, and supplier information, but no sensitive personal data (e.g., national ID numbers or credit card details) was compromised. The incident did not disrupt Logitech’s operations or products. The company engaged external cybersecurity firms for investigation and response, patched the vulnerability promptly, and notified regulatory bodies. Clop’s attack leveraged a multi-stage Java implant for data theft, reflecting a broader trend of extortion-focused breaches without operational encryption.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-14
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882)Third-Party Software (Oracle E-Business Suite)Multi-Stage Java Implant
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882 (Oracle E-Business Suite)
Threat Actor: Clop Ransomware Gang
Motivation: Data TheftExtortion
Title: Massive $230 Million Cryptocurrency Heist and Money Laundering Scheme (2023–2025)
Description: A coordinated cybercrime ring, primarily composed of young adults (ages 18–22), executed a large-scale cryptocurrency heist between October 2023 and March 2025, stealing approximately $230 million (now valued at over $384.5 million) through social engineering attacks targeting victims' crypto accounts. The group laundered funds via crypto mixers, shell companies, and sophisticated blockchain techniques, financing lavish lifestyles. Eight defendants, including Kunal Mehta (aka 'Papa,' 'The Accountant,' 'Shrek'), have pleaded guilty to charges including money laundering, wire fraud conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. The FBI and DOJ led the investigation, highlighting the use of online gaming communities to recruit members and the group's operational errors in laundering (e.g., linking Monero conversions to original stolen amounts).
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-05-00
Type: cyber theft
Attack Vector: social engineeringphishing (calls/emails/texts)hardware wallet theftcryptocurrency account takeover
Vulnerability Exploited: human trust (social engineering)lack of multi-factor authentication (MFA) on crypto accountsweak identity verification for wallet transfers
Threat Actor: Name: Unnamed Cybercrime RingAliases: ['Papa/Shrek/The Accountant (Kunal Mehta)', 'Greavys/Anne Hathaway/$$$ (Malone Lam)', 'Box/VersaceGod/@SkidStar (Jeandiel Serrano)', 'Chen/Squiggly', 'Danny/Meech']Type: organized cybercrime groupMotivation: ['financial gain', 'lavish lifestyle funding']Size: 14+ members (primarily ages 18–22)Nationalities: ['United States (CA, NY, FL, CT)', 'New Zealand', 'unknown (international)']Recruitment Method: online gaming communities
Motivation: financial profitluxury purchases (cars, jets, real estate)status/social validation
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through /loginok.html endpoint, Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61882) and phishing calls/emails/textsstolen hardware walletscompromised exchange APIs.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Systems Affected: Wing FTP Server
Operational Impact: Complete administrative control over the affected server
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Financial Loss: No material financial impact reported
Data Compromised: Employee information, Consumer information, Customer information, Supplier information
Systems Affected: Internal IT systems
Downtime: None
Operational Impact: None
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk (limited data exposure)
Legal Liabilities: Potential regulatory scrutiny (e.g., GDPR if European consumer data affected)
Identity Theft Risk: Low (no sensitive PII compromised)
Payment Information Risk: None (no credit card details exposed)
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Financial Loss: $230 million (original) / $384.5 million (current Bitcoin value)
Data Compromised: Cryptocurrency private keys, Wallet credentials, Personal identification info (pii) for account takeovers
Systems Affected: cryptocurrency exchangespersonal crypto wallets (hardware/software)bank accounts (shell companies)
Revenue Loss: $230 million (direct theft)
Brand Reputation Impact: eroded trust in cryptocurrency securityhigh-profile media coverage of youth-led cybercrime
Legal Liabilities: DOJ charges: wire fraud, money laundering, racketeering, obstruction of justicepotential civil lawsuits from victims
Identity Theft Risk: high (for crypto account holders)
Payment Information Risk: high (cryptocurrency credentials)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $76.67 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Non-Sensitive Employee Data, Consumer Data, Customer Data, Supplier Data, , Cryptocurrency Private Keys, Transaction Histories, Pii (Emails, Phone Numbers For Phishing) and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Entity Name: Organizations running Wing FTP Server
Entity Type: Organization
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Entity Name: Logitech International S.A.
Entity Type: Public Company
Industry: Consumer Electronics / Computer Peripherals
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland (HQ)
Size: Large (Global)
Customers Affected: Limited (specific numbers not disclosed)
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Entity Name: Unnamed Washington D.C. Victim
Entity Type: individual
Industry: cryptocurrency investment
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Entity Name: Multiple Cryptocurrency Exchange Users
Entity Type: individuals
Location: USAinternational
Customers Affected: thousands (estimated)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Containment Measures: Update to version 7.4.4
Remediation Measures: Review anonymous access configurations
Enhanced Monitoring: Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: External Cybersecurity Firms (Unnamed).
Containment Measures: Prompt detectionVulnerability patching (post-Oracle fix)Engagement of external experts
Remediation Measures: InvestigationAssessment of affected partiesRegulatory notifications
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure (SEC filings, press releases)Stakeholder notificationsTransparency reports
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Fbi Cyber Division, Doj Criminal Division, Cryptocurrency Forensics Firms (E.G., Chainalysis).
Containment Measures: asset freezing (crypto wallets)shell company investigationsarrests (14 indicted)
Remediation Measures: victim restitution effortspublic advisories on social engineering risks
Recovery Measures: seizure of luxury assets (cars, properties)blockchain tracing to recover funds
Communication Strategy: DOJ press releasesFBI public warningsmedia interviews
Enhanced Monitoring: blockchain analysis for peel chainsVPN/IP tracking
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through External cybersecurity firms (unnamed), , FBI Cyber Division, DOJ Criminal Division, cryptocurrency forensics firms (e.g., Chainalysis), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Type of Data Compromised: Non-sensitive employee data, Consumer data, Customer data, Supplier data
Sensitivity of Data: Low (no PII like national IDs or payment info)
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Type of Data Compromised: Cryptocurrency private keys, Transaction histories, Pii (emails, phone numbers for phishing)
Sensitivity of Data: extremely high (financial credentials)
File Types Exposed: wallet.dat files2FA backup codesexchange API keys
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Review anonymous access configurations, Investigation, Assessment of affected parties, Regulatory notifications, , victim restitution efforts, public advisories on social engineering risks, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by update to version 7.4.4, prompt detection, vulnerability patching (post-oracle fix), engagement of external experts, , asset freezing (crypto wallets), shell company investigations, arrests (14 indicted) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Ransomware Strain: Clop (extortion-focused, no encryption)
Data Exfiltration: True
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through seizure of luxury assets (cars, properties), blockchain tracing to recover funds, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Regulatory Notifications: Government entities (as required)Potential GDPR notifications if EU data affected
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Regulations Violated: 18 U.S. Code § 1956 (money laundering), 18 U.S. Code § 1343 (wire fraud), RICO (racketeering), Bank Secrecy Act (shell companies),
Legal Actions: 14 indictments (May 2025), 8 guilty pleas (as of 2025), asset forfeiture (luxury items),
Regulatory Notifications: FinCEN (suspicious activity reports)SEC (if exchanges involved)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through 14 indictments (May 2025), 8 guilty pleas (as of 2025), asset forfeiture (luxury items), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Lessons Learned: Third-party software vulnerabilities pose significant risks, even for non-core systems., Zero-day exploits require rapid patching and vendor coordination., Extortion-focused attacks (data theft without encryption) are increasing, necessitating proactive threat intelligence., Transparency in disclosure helps maintain stakeholder trust., Multi-layered defenses (e.g., zero-trust architectures) are critical to mitigate supply chain risks.
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Lessons Learned: Social engineering remains a critical vector for high-value crypto theft, exploiting trust in online communities (e.g., gaming)., Crypto laundering techniques (mixers, peel chains) are effective but prone to operator error (e.g., Monero conversion tracing)., Youth-led cybercrime groups can achieve sophisticated operations through division of labor (hackers, launderers, organizers)., Shell companies and VPNs are common but traceable with blockchain forensics and financial investigations., Public-private collaboration (FBI, DOJ, exchanges) is essential for disrupting crypto-based crime rings.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Recommendations: Update to version 7.4.4 immediately, Review anonymous access configurations, Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systemsUpdate to version 7.4.4 immediately, Review anonymous access configurations, Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systemsUpdate to version 7.4.4 immediately, Review anonymous access configurations, Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Recommendations: Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments, especially for enterprise software dependencies., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks.
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Recommendations: Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols).Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols).Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols).Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols).Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols).
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Third-party software vulnerabilities pose significant risks, even for non-core systems.,Zero-day exploits require rapid patching and vendor coordination.,Extortion-focused attacks (data theft without encryption) are increasing, necessitating proactive threat intelligence.,Transparency in disclosure helps maintain stakeholder trust.,Multi-layered defenses (e.g., zero-trust architectures) are critical to mitigate supply chain risks.Social engineering remains a critical vector for high-value crypto theft, exploiting trust in online communities (e.g., gaming).,Crypto laundering techniques (mixers, peel chains) are effective but prone to operator error (e.g., Monero conversion tracing).,Youth-led cybercrime groups can achieve sophisticated operations through division of labor (hackers, launderers, organizers).,Shell companies and VPNs are common but traceable with blockchain forensics and financial investigations.,Public-private collaboration (FBI, DOJ, exchanges) is essential for disrupting crypto-based crime rings.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Update to version 7.4.4 immediately, Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems and Review anonymous access configurations.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Source: Wing FTP Server team
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: The Globe and Mail
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: The Hacker News (X posts)
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: StockTitan
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: Boston Institute of Analytics
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: Logitech Official Security Vulnerability Reporting Page
URL: https://www.logitech.com/en-us/company/contact-us/security-vulnerability-reporting.html
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: Investing.com
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Source: TipRanks (SEC filings)
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Source: U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release
URL: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/eighth-defendant-pleads-guilty-role-230-million-cryptocurrency-heist
Date Accessed: 2025-05-00
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Source: FBI Statement on Cybercrime Ring Takedown
URL: https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/cryptocurrency-heist-money-laundering-scheme-052025
Date Accessed: 2025-05-00
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Source: ZachXBT (Blockchain Investigator) Tweet Thread
URL: https://twitter.com/zachxbt/status/xxxxxx
Date Accessed: 2024-08-18
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Source: BBC News: 'The Teenagers Who Stole $230m in Crypto'
URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-xxxx
Date Accessed: 2025-05-10
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Wing FTP Server team, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: The Globe and Mail, and Source: The Hacker News (X posts), and Source: StockTitan, and Source: Boston Institute of Analytics, and Source: Logitech Official Security Vulnerability Reporting PageUrl: https://www.logitech.com/en-us/company/contact-us/security-vulnerability-reporting.html, and Source: Investing.com, and Source: TipRanks (SEC filings), and Source: U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Press ReleaseUrl: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/eighth-defendant-pleads-guilty-role-230-million-cryptocurrency-heistDate Accessed: 2025-05-00, and Source: FBI Statement on Cybercrime Ring TakedownUrl: https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/cryptocurrency-heist-money-laundering-scheme-052025Date Accessed: 2025-05-00, and Source: ZachXBT (Blockchain Investigator) Tweet ThreadUrl: https://twitter.com/zachxbt/status/xxxxxxDate Accessed: 2024-08-18, and Source: BBC News: 'The Teenagers Who Stole $230m in Crypto'Url: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-xxxxDate Accessed: 2025-05-10.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Investigation Status: Ongoing (external cybersecurity firms engaged; containment confirmed)
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Investigation Status: ongoing (8 guilty pleas, 6 defendants awaiting trial)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure (Sec Filings, Press Releases), Stakeholder Notifications, Transparency Reports, Doj Press Releases, Fbi Public Warnings and Media Interviews.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Disclosure Via Sec Filings, Press Releases, Regulatory Notifications.
Customer Advisories: Assessment and notification of affected parties in progress
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Stakeholder Advisories: Fbi Warning: 'Beware Of Unsolicited Calls/Emails Requesting Crypto Credentials Or 2Fa Codes.', Doj Advisory: 'Report Suspicious Crypto Transactions To Fincen And Local Law Enforcement.'.
Customer Advisories: Use hardware wallets (e.g., Ledger, Trezor) for large crypto holdings.Verify all transaction requests via a secondary channel (e.g., in-person call).Monitor accounts for unauthorized transfers, especially after phishing attempts.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Disclosure Via Sec Filings, Press Releases, Regulatory Notifications, Assessment And Notification Of Affected Parties In Progress, , Fbi Warning: 'Beware Of Unsolicited Calls/Emails Requesting Crypto Credentials Or 2Fa Codes.', Doj Advisory: 'Report Suspicious Crypto Transactions To Fincen And Local Law Enforcement.', Use Hardware Wallets (E.G., Ledger, Trezor) For Large Crypto Holdings., Verify All Transaction Requests Via A Secondary Channel (E.G., In-Person Call)., Monitor Accounts For Unauthorized Transfers, Especially After Phishing Attempts. and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Entry Point: /loginok.html endpoint
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Entry Point: Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61882)
Reconnaissance Period: Exploited since July 2025 (prior to Oracle patch on October 4, 2025)
High Value Targets: Internal It Systems, Employee/Consumer/Customer/Supplier Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Internal It Systems, Employee/Consumer/Customer/Supplier Data,
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Entry Point: Phishing Calls/Emails/Texts, Stolen Hardware Wallets, Compromised Exchange Apis,
Reconnaissance Period: October 2023 – March 2025 (18 months)
Backdoors Established: ['persistent access to victim wallets', 'shell company bank accounts']
High Value Targets: Whale Crypto Investors, Exchange Users With Weak Security,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Whale Crypto Investors, Exchange Users With Weak Security,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation DAR354070325
Root Causes: Improper NULL byte handling in the server’s authentication mechanism
Corrective Actions: Proper input validation to prevent NULL byte injection attacks
Incident : Data Breach DAR4802248111625
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability In Third-Party Software (Oracle E-Business Suite)., Lack Of Real-Time Detection For Multi-Stage Java Implants Used By Clop., Supply Chain Risk Exposure Due To Reliance On External Enterprise Software.,
Corrective Actions: Immediate Patching Of The Vulnerability Post-Oracle Fix., Engagement Of External Cybersecurity Experts For Investigation., Enhanced Monitoring For Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) Related To Cve-2025-61882., Review Of Third-Party Software Dependencies And Vulnerability Management Processes., Public Disclosure And Transparency To Maintain Trust.,
Incident : cyber theft DAR1332113111925
Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Sms/Email-Based 2Fa For Crypto Accounts., Lack Of Transaction Velocity Limits On High-Value Transfers., Exploitation Of Online Gaming Communities For Recruitment And Coordination., Inadequate Kyc/Aml Controls For Crypto-To-Fiat Conversions Via Shell Companies.,
Corrective Actions: Mandatory Hardware 2Fa For Exchanges Handling >$10K/Day In Transfers., Blockchain Monitoring Partnerships Between Exchanges And Law Enforcement., Public Awareness Campaigns Targeting Youth In Online Gaming Spaces., Legislative Proposals To Close Shell Company Loopholes For Crypto Laundering.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, External Cybersecurity Firms (Unnamed), , Fbi Cyber Division, Doj Criminal Division, Cryptocurrency Forensics Firms (E.G., Chainalysis), , Blockchain Analysis For Peel Chains, Vpn/Ip Tracking, .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Proper input validation to prevent NULL byte injection attacks, Immediate Patching Of The Vulnerability Post-Oracle Fix., Engagement Of External Cybersecurity Experts For Investigation., Enhanced Monitoring For Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) Related To Cve-2025-61882., Review Of Third-Party Software Dependencies And Vulnerability Management Processes., Public Disclosure And Transparency To Maintain Trust., , Mandatory Hardware 2Fa For Exchanges Handling >$10K/Day In Transfers., Blockchain Monitoring Partnerships Between Exchanges And Law Enforcement., Public Awareness Campaigns Targeting Youth In Online Gaming Spaces., Legislative Proposals To Close Shell Company Loopholes For Crypto Laundering., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Clop Ransomware Gang, Name: Unnamed Cybercrime RingAliases: ['Papa/Shrek/The Accountant (Kunal Mehta)', 'Greavys/Anne Hathaway/$$$ (Malone Lam)', 'Box/VersaceGod/@SkidStar (Jeandiel Serrano)', 'Chen/Squiggly', 'Danny/Meech']Type: organized cybercrime groupMotivation: ['financial gain', 'lavish lifestyle funding']Size: 14+ members (primarily ages 18–22)Nationalities: ['United States (CA, NY, FL, CT)', 'New Zealand' and 'unknown (international)']Recruitment Method: online gaming communities.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-05-00.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Employee information, Consumer information, Customer information, Supplier information, , cryptocurrency private keys, wallet credentials, personal identification info (PII) for account takeovers and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Internal IT systems and cryptocurrency exchangespersonal crypto wallets (hardware/software)bank accounts (shell companies).
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was external cybersecurity firms (unnamed), , fbi cyber division, doj criminal division, cryptocurrency forensics firms (e.g., chainalysis), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Update to version 7.4.4, Prompt detectionVulnerability patching (post-Oracle fix)Engagement of external experts and asset freezing (crypto wallets)shell company investigationsarrests (14 indicted).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Supplier information, cryptocurrency private keys, Consumer information, Employee information, personal identification info (PII) for account takeovers, wallet credentials and Customer information.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was 14 indictments (May 2025), 8 guilty pleas (as of 2025), asset forfeiture (luxury items), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public-private collaboration (FBI, DOJ, exchanges) is essential for disrupting crypto-based crime rings.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Review anonymous access configurations, Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs., Invest in advanced detection tools for zero-day exploits., Implement network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, Law enforcement: Expand focus on online gaming/community platforms as recruitment hubs for cybercrime., Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement., Parents/educators: Address the glamourization of cybercrime in youth subcultures (e.g., luxury purchases as status symbols)., Regulators: Strengthen KYC/AML requirements for crypto-to-fiat conversions and shell company registrations., Foster a culture of security vigilance with employee training on phishing and social engineering risks., Update to version 7.4.4 immediately, Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Cryptocurrency users: Enable hardware-based MFA, use cold storage for large holdings, and never share private keys/2FA codes., Exchanges: Implement behavioral analysis for unusual transfers and educate users on phishing risks., Conduct regular supply chain risk assessments and especially for enterprise software dependencies..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are BBC News: 'The Teenagers Who Stole $230m in Crypto', Logitech Official Security Vulnerability Reporting Page, Boston Institute of Analytics, The Globe and Mail, Investing.com, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release, ZachXBT (Blockchain Investigator) Tweet Thread, FBI Statement on Cybercrime Ring Takedown, StockTitan, The Hacker News (X posts), BleepingComputer, TipRanks (SEC filings) and Wing FTP Server team.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.logitech.com/en-us/company/contact-us/security-vulnerability-reporting.html, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/eighth-defendant-pleads-guilty-role-230-million-cryptocurrency-heist, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/cryptocurrency-heist-money-laundering-scheme-052025, https://twitter.com/zachxbt/status/xxxxxx, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-xxxx .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (external cybersecurity firms engaged; containment confirmed).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public disclosure via SEC filings, Press releases, Regulatory notifications, FBI warning: 'Beware of unsolicited calls/emails requesting crypto credentials or 2FA codes.', DOJ advisory: 'Report suspicious crypto transactions to FinCEN and local law enforcement.', .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Assessment and notification of affected parties in progress, Use hardware wallets (e.g., Ledger, Trezor) for large crypto holdings.Verify all transaction requests via a secondary channel (e.g., in-person call).Monitor accounts for unauthorized transfers and especially after phishing attempts.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an /loginok.html endpoint and Zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61882).
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Exploited since July 2025 (prior to Oracle patch on October 4, 2025), October 2023 – March 2025 (18 months).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Improper NULL byte handling in the server’s authentication mechanism, Unpatched zero-day vulnerability in third-party software (Oracle E-Business Suite).Lack of real-time detection for multi-stage Java implants used by Clop.Supply chain risk exposure due to reliance on external enterprise software., Over-reliance on SMS/email-based 2FA for crypto accounts.Lack of transaction velocity limits on high-value transfers.Exploitation of online gaming communities for recruitment and coordination.Inadequate KYC/AML controls for crypto-to-fiat conversions via shell companies..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Proper input validation to prevent NULL byte injection attacks, Immediate patching of the vulnerability post-Oracle fix.Engagement of external cybersecurity experts for investigation.Enhanced monitoring for indicators of compromise (IoCs) related to CVE-2025-61882.Review of third-party software dependencies and vulnerability management processes.Public disclosure and transparency to maintain trust., Mandatory hardware 2FA for exchanges handling >$10k/day in transfers.Blockchain monitoring partnerships between exchanges and law enforcement.Public awareness campaigns targeting youth in online gaming spaces.Legislative proposals to close shell company loopholes for crypto laundering..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=darkwebinformer' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
