Dark Web Informer Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DAR4802248111625)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Dark Web Informer breach identified under incident ID DAR4802248111625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Dark Web Informer's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/darkwebinformer, the number of followers: 10666, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 10 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 703 and after the incident was 636 with a difference of -67 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Dark Web Informer and their customers.

On 14 November 2025, Logitech International S.A. disclosed Data Breach, Zero-Day Exploit and Third-Party Vulnerability issues under the banner "Logitech Data Breach via Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business Suite".

Logitech International S.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal IT systems, and exposing Employee information, Consumer information and Customer information, plus an estimated financial loss of No material financial impact reported.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Prompt detection, Vulnerability patching (post-Oracle fix) and Engagement of external experts, and began remediation that includes Investigation, Assessment of affected parties and Regulatory notifications, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure (SEC filings, press releases), Stakeholder notifications and Transparency reports.

The case underscores how Ongoing (external cybersecurity firms engaged; containment confirmed), teams are taking away lessons such as Third-party software vulnerabilities pose significant risks, even for non-core systems, Zero-day exploits require rapid patching and vendor coordination and Extortion-focused attacks (data theft without encryption) are increasing, necessitating proactive threat intelligence, and recommending next steps like Implement robust third-party vulnerability management programs, Adopt zero-trust security models to limit lateral movement and Enhance threat intelligence sharing to preemptively identify indicators of compromise (IoCs), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public disclosure via SEC filings, Press releases and Regulatory notifications.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, and exploited since July 2025. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: Java (T1059.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating multi-stage Java implant for data theft. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating multi-stage Java implant (potential web shell functionality implied). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating multi-stage Java implant (suggests obfuscation to evade detection) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lack of real-time detection for multi-stage Java implants (implies evasion of defenses). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (T1003.005) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating internal IT systems access implied; common follow-on from web shells. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltration of internal data (implies prior discovery of target files). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including unauthorized data exfiltration from Logitech’s internal IT systems, and employee, consumer, customer, and supplier information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration (method not specified; Clop typically uses obfuscated channels). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Theft for Extortion (T1659) with high confidence (99%), with evidence including clop extortion gang, data theft-driven extortion, and no operational disruption (pure extortion model). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.