Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CRU1769440011)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Crunchbase's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Crunchbase Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Crunchbase breach identified under incident ID CRU1769440011.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Crunchbase's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/crunchbase, the number of followers: 157511, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 251 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 581 and after the incident was 487 with a difference of -94 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Crunchbase and their customers.
Crunchbase recently reported "Crunchbase Data Breach by ShinyHunters", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Market intelligence firm Crunchbase confirmed a data breach after the ShinyHunters cybercrime group published files allegedly stolen from its systems.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Corporate network, and exposing Over 2 million records (PII, contracts, corporate data), with nearly Over 2 million records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Breach contained, systems secured, and stakeholders are being briefed through Statement to SecurityWeek, ongoing review.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor accessed certain documents from its corporate network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Unknown (implies possible external access). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters group accessed corporate network (implies credential abuse) and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pattern of recent ShinyHunters attacks (common brute force use). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating over 2 million records (PII, contracts, corporate data) exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating corporate data and contracts compromised from network. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 400 MB of compressed files posted online after ransom refusal and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters published stolen files online. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransom demanded (implies possible encryption threat). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor accessed corporate network (implies valid account use) and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach contained, systems secured (implies evasion during attack). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Crunchbase Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/crunchbase/incident/CRU1769440011
- Crunchbase CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/crunchbase
- Crunchbase Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/cru1769440011-crunchbase-breach-january-2026/
- Crunchbase CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/crunchbase/history
- Crunchbase CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.securityweek.com/crunchbase-confirms-data-breach-after-hacking-claims/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf