Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Crew & Concierge Ltd.Crew & Concierge Ltd.
VS
ManpowerGroupManpowerGroup
Crew & Concierge Ltd.

Crew & Concierge Ltd.

Henry Street, Bath, BA1 1BT, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
738/1000Moderate

Crew & Concierge is an International Recruitment Agency specialising in the onboarding of personnel for the maritime sector. As predominantly Crew recruiters with 15 years of experience and a large organically built, bespoke database, we are now naturally transitionin...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

100 Manpower Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53212

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.manpowergroup.com
654/1000Weak

ManpowerGroup® (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds o...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:74,247
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crew & Concierge Ltd.

Crew & Concierge Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crew & Concierge Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crew & Concierge Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crew & Concierge Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ManpowerGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ManpowerGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crew & Concierge Ltd.

Crew & Concierge Ltd.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRE351092125
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAN847081825

FAQ

Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. and ManpowerGroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. and ManpowerGroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crew & Concierge Ltd. or ManpowerGroup ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crew & Concierge Ltd. or ManpowerGroup ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. and ManpowerGroup, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crew & Concierge Ltd. and ManpowerGroup, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1