ManpowerGroup
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
manpowergroup
Website:
Employees number:
72,018
Number of followers:
3,259,374
NAICS:
5613
Industry Type:
Homepage:
manpowergroup.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
MAN_2370206
Scan Status:
In-progress
ManpowerGroup Company CyberSecurity Posture
manpowergroup.com
ManpowerGroup® (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds of thousands of organizations every year, providing them with skilled talent while finding meaningful, sustainable employment for millions of people across a wide range of industries and skills. Our expert family of brands – Manpower, Experis and Talent Solutions – creates substantially more value for candidates and clients across more than 80 countries and territories and has done so for 75 years. We are recognized consistently for our diversity - as a best place to work for Women, Inclusion, Equality and Disability and in 2023 ManpowerGroup was named one of the World's Most Ethical Companies for the 14th year - all confirming our position as the brand of choice for in-demand talent. See how ManpowerGroup is powering the future of work: www.manpowergroup.com
ManpowerGroup A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
ManpowerGroup Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
ManpowerGroup
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
ManpowerGroup Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
ManpowerGroup
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
ManpowerGroup Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
1
Manpower (Lansing, Michigan franchise)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: The Lansing, Michigan franchise of global staffing firm **Manpower** suffered a **ransomware attack** by the **RansomHub** group, compromising the personal data of **144,189 individuals**. The breach occurred between **December 29, 2024, and January 12, 2025**, with attackers exfiltrating **500GB of data**, including **Social Security cards, driver’s licenses, passports, corporate bank statements, HR analytics, employee records, customer lists, and confidential contracts**. The franchise experienced an **IT outage on January 20**, disrupting local systems. While ManpowerGroup’s corporate systems remained unaffected, the franchise notified victims, offered **credit monitoring via Equifax**, and reported the incident to the **FBI**. RansomHub publicly threatened to leak the data unless a ransom was paid, posting **screenshots of stolen files** as proof. The financial and reputational fallout remains significant, though the full extent of the damage is undisclosed.
ManpowerGroup (Lansing, Mich. franchise)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: ManpowerGroup confirmed a ransomware attack on its Lansing, Michigan franchise between **December 29, 2024, and January 12, 2025**, compromising **144,189 individuals**. The breach involved exfiltration of **client personal data**, including names and basic details, while attackers claimed access to **sensitive records** such as passport scans, Social Security numbers, financial documents, and HR analytics. The incident highlights risks tied to third-party vendors handling confidential information, with potential long-term repercussions for affected individuals, including identity theft and financial fraud. Manpower did not disclose whether a ransom was paid or if operations were disrupted, but the scale and nature of the stolen data suggest severe exposure risks for both clients and employees.
Manpower (Lansing, Michigan franchise)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A cyberattack on Manpower’s franchise office in Lansing, Michigan, resulted in unauthorized network access between late December 2024 and mid-January 2025. The breach, attributed to the ransomware group **RansomHub**, compromised the personal data of **144,189 individuals**, including employees and potentially customers. The incident was discovered after an IT outage on January 20, 2025. While isolated to the franchise’s independent data platform, the attack exposed sensitive information, prompting Manpower to offer **one year of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection** to affected individuals. The company reported the incident to the FBI and is cooperating with investigations. The breach underscores vulnerabilities in franchise-level cybersecurity and the escalating threat of ransomware-driven data exfiltration.
ManpowerGroup Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for ManpowerGroup
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2025.
Incident Types ManpowerGroup vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2025.
Incident History — ManpowerGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ManpowerGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
ManpowerGroup Company Subsidiaries
ManpowerGroup® (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds of thousands of organizations every year, providing them with skilled talent while finding meaningful, sustainable employment for millions of people across a wide range of industries and skills. Our expert family of brands – Manpower, Experis and Talent Solutions – creates substantially more value for candidates and clients across more than 80 countries and territories and has done so for 75 years. We are recognized consistently for our diversity - as a best place to work for Women, Inclusion, Equality and Disability and in 2023 ManpowerGroup was named one of the World's Most Ethical Companies for the 14th year - all confirming our position as the brand of choice for in-demand talent. See how ManpowerGroup is powering the future of work: www.manpowergroup.com
Loading...
ManpowerGroup Similar Companies
Aya Healthcare
Aya Healthcare is the largest healthcare talent software and staffing company in the United States. Aya operates the world’s largest digital staffing platform delivering every component of healthcare-focused labor services, including travel nursing and allied health, per diem, permanent staff hiring
Hays
We are leaders in specialist recruitment and workforce solutions, offering advisory services such as learning and skill development, career transitions and employer brand positioning. As the Leadership Partner to our customers, we invest in lifelong partnerships that empower people and businesses t
Confidential
Perfect placements. Rapid staffing. We are the foremost provider of exceptional HR solutions. We offer contract, temporary and permanent placement solutions for roles in finance and accounting, technology, marketing and creative, legal, and administrative and customer support. We deliver invaluable
StudentConsulting
We are one of the leading recruitment and staffing companies in Scandinavia, specialized in students, academics and young professionals. Thanks to a large network and long experience, we have filled over 20 000 positions in the last year. We offer interesting and challenging services in areas such a
Michael Page
Welcome to the Michael Page global company profile. Michael Page has five decades of expertise in professional services recruitment. We were established in London in 1976, and over this period we've grown organically to become one of the best-known and most respected consultancies, with an office n
TrueBlue Inc.
TrueBlue (NYSE: TBI) is a leading staffing, recruiting and workforce management company. The company fills individual positions on demand, staffs entire facilities, and manages outsourced recruiting processes and staffing vendor programs for a wide variety of clients. The company's specialized workf
TeamLease Services Limited
TeamLease Services is one of India’s leading people supply chain companies offering a range of solutions to 3500+ employers for their hiring, productivity and scale challenges. A Fortune India 500 company listed on the NSE & BSE, TeamLease has hired 20 lakhs+ people over the last 20 years. One of In
Insight Global
Insight Global is an international professional services and staffing company specializing in delivering talent and technical solutions to Fortune 1000 companies across the IT, Non-IT, Healthcare, and Engineering industries. Fueled by staffing and talent experts, Evergreen, our professional services
Express Employment International
Founded in 1983 and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Express Employment International supports the Express Employment Professionals franchise and related brands. The Express franchise brand is an industry-leading, international staffing company with franchise locations across the U.S., Canada, South
.png)
ManpowerGroup CyberSecurity News
October 28, 2025 07:00 AM
CFOs Double Down on AI and Cybersecurity as Tariffs Emerge as Major New Threat
PRNewswire/ -- Tariffs and trade barriers have surged to become a top-five concern for America's Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) in 2025,...
October 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Jefferson Wells (NYSE: MAN) 2025 CFO Survey: 96% engage AI; 73% in cyber strategy
2025 CFO Priorities Report: profitability at 34%; 45% plan finance hires next quarter, 65% over 12–24 months, and 59% plan external AI...
September 16, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity, AI, and Economic Uncertainty: How Internal Audit Teams Are Managing 2025's Top Risks
The firm's ninth annual Internal Audit Priorities Survey finds that cybersecurity remains the top emerging risk for the fifth consecutive...
September 16, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity, AI, and Economic Uncertainty: How Internal Audit Teams Are Managing 2025's Top Risks
Cybersecurity, AI, and economic uncertainty are dominating the priorities of internal audit leaders in 2025, according to Jefferson Wells,...
September 11, 2025 07:00 AM
CHROs should take a more active role in digital security, Gartner advises
Many CHROs do not have strong digital awareness and are struggling to lead and influence AI and digital transformation,” a Gartner analyst...
September 07, 2025 07:00 AM
Ransomware Attack Exposes Customer Data: ManpowerGroup Confirms Security Breach
In an age where data breaches seem to be a common occurrence, the news of a significant incident affecting a Michigan-based staffing...
August 15, 2025 07:00 AM
ManpowerGroup ransomware attack leaked customer data, staffing firm says
Hackers reportedly stole files including Social Security cards, passports, hours worked and worksite information, among other documents.
August 12, 2025 07:00 AM
Manpower franchise discloses data theft after RansomHub posts alleged stolen data
Global staffing firm Manpower confirmed ransomware criminals broke into its Lansing, Michigan franchise's network and stole personal...
August 12, 2025 07:00 AM
Manpower Data Breach Investigation
If you were affected by the Manpower Group data breach, you may be entitled to compensation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
ManpowerGroup CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of ManpowerGroup
The official website of ManpowerGroup is http://www.manpowergroup.com.
ManpowerGroup’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 527, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does ManpowerGroup’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does ManpowerGroup have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does ManpowerGroup have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does ManpowerGroup comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does ManpowerGroup have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does ManpowerGroup comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, ManpowerGroup is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does ManpowerGroup have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,ManpowerGroup is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of ManpowerGroup
ManpowerGroup operates primarily in the Staffing and Recruiting industry.
Number of Employees at ManpowerGroup
ManpowerGroup employs approximately 72,018 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by ManpowerGroup
ManpowerGroup presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
ManpowerGroup’s LinkedIn Followers
ManpowerGroup’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,259,374 followers.
NAICS Classification of ManpowerGroup
ManpowerGroup is classified under the NAICS code 5613, which corresponds to Employment Services.
ManpowerGroup’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, ManpowerGroup does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
ManpowerGroup’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, ManpowerGroup maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/manpowergroup.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving ManpowerGroup
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that ManpowerGroup has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
ManpowerGroup has an estimated 11,804 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at ManpowerGroup ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.
How does ManpowerGroup detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with external security experts (investigation), third party assistance with equifax (credit monitoring and identity theft protection), and law enforcement notified with fbi, and recovery measures with free equifax credit monitoring and identity theft protection for affected individuals, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected individuals, communication strategy with public statement via the register, communication strategy with data breach notification filed with maine attorney general, and incident response plan activated with yes (investigation launched post-detection), incident response plan activated with yes (access revoked, safeguards added), and law enforcement notified with yes (fbi informed), and containment measures with access to compromised crm platform revoked, and remediation measures with added extra safeguards against similar incidents, and recovery measures with free credit monitoring and identity theft protection for 1 year, and communication strategy with public disclosure (via spokesperson), communication strategy with public statement, and enhanced monitoring with likely (implied by 'extra safeguards'), and incident response plan activated with yes (public advisory issued), and containment measures with isolation of compromised salesforce instance, and remediation measures with user advisories to strengthen account protections, and communication strategy with public disclosure, user notifications..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Ransomware Attack on Manpower Lansing Franchise
Description: Global staffing firm Manpower confirmed a ransomware attack on its independently operated Lansing, Michigan franchise, resulting in the theft of personal information belonging to 144,189 individuals. The RansomHub extortion group claimed responsibility, asserting they stole 500GB of data, including sensitive documents like social security cards, driver’s licenses, passports, financial statements, HR data, and corporate contracts. The breach was isolated to the franchise’s independent data platform, with no impact on ManpowerGroup’s corporate systems. The incident was detected in January 2025, with unauthorized access occurring between December 29, 2024, and January 12, 2025. Affected individuals were notified and offered free Equifax credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. The FBI was notified, and the franchise pledged cooperation in the investigation.
Date Detected: 2025-01-20
Type: Ransomware
Threat Actor: RansomHub
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
Title: ['Cyberattack on Manpower’s Michigan Office Compromises Data for 144,000 People', 'Workday Data Breach in Widespread Social Engineering Scam']
Description: ['Manpower, a leading staffing firm, announced that a cyberattack on one of its franchise offices in Lansing, Michigan, exposed the personal data of 144,189 people. The company discovered the unauthorized access on January 20, 2025, after an IT outage. A subsequent investigation found that a hacker had been in their network from late December 2024 to mid-January 2025. The group RansomHub claimed responsibility. Manpower is providing free credit monitoring and identity theft protection for one year and has informed the FBI.', "Workday revealed a data breach related to a third-party CRM platform, part of a 'social engineering campaign' targeting many large organizations. Hackers accessed basic business contact details (names, emails, phone numbers), but Workday stated there is no sign that customer data was accessed. The breach is linked to the ShinyHunters group, known for impersonating IT support to access corporate databases. Workday acted quickly to revoke access and added safeguards."]
Date Detected: 2025-01-20
Type: Data Breach / Ransomware Attack
Attack Vector: Network Intrusion (likely via unpatched vulnerability or phishing)Social Engineering (impersonating IT support via fake calls)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability (tricking employees into divulging credentials)
Threat Actor: RansomHubShinyHunters
Motivation: Financial gain (ransomware) / Data theftData theft / Corporate espionage
Title: Google Third-Party Salesforce Data Breach (June 2025)
Description: Google warned its 2.5 billion Gmail users to strengthen account protections following a data breach involving one of its third-party Salesforce systems. The breach, linked to the extortion group ShinyHunters, occurred after attackers executed a vishing attack to trick an employee into granting access. The compromised Salesforce instance contained contact information and sales notes for small and midsize businesses. Google confirmed no financial data was exposed, and the compromised information was limited to business names and contact details, much of it already public.
Date Detected: June 2025
Date Publicly Disclosed: June 2025
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Vishing (Voice Phishing)
Vulnerability Exploited: Social Engineering (Human Error)
Threat Actor: ShinyHunters
Motivation: Extortion, Data Theft
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Third-party CRM platform (via social engineering) and Vishing attack on employee.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Data Compromised: Personal information (144,189 individuals), Social security cards, Driver’s licenses, Passports, Financial statements, Hr data analytics, Corporate bank statements, Employee hours and worksites, Customer lists, Confidential contracts, Non-disclosure agreements, Names and addresses
Systems Affected: Lansing Franchise Network (Independent Data Platform)
Downtime: IT outage on 2025-01-20 (duration unspecified)
Operational Impact: Disrupted access to local systemsIsolated incident (no corporate systems affected)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to data exposurePublic disclosure of breach by RansomHub
Legal Liabilities: Lawsuit filed against Manpower (mentioned in stolen data screenshots)
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (PII including SSNs, driver’s licenses, passports exposed)']
Payment Information Risk: ['Corporate bank statements compromised']
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Data Compromised: Personal data of 144,189 individuals, Basic business contact details (names, emails, phone numbers)
Systems Affected: Franchise office network (Lansing, Michigan)Third-party CRM platform
Downtime: ['IT outage reported (duration unspecified)']
Operational Impact: Isolated to franchise; no impact on ManpowerGroup’s corporate networkNo impact on Workday’s core customer tenants or data
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to data exposurePotential reputational damage due to association with ShinyHunters' broader campaign
Legal Liabilities: Potential regulatory scrutiny (e.g., state data breach laws)
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (credit monitoring offered to affected individuals)', 'Low (only business contact details exposed)']
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Data Compromised: Business names, Contact details (emails, phone numbers), Sales notes
Systems Affected: Third-party Salesforce instance
Operational Impact: Limited; no core Google systems affected
Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (public disclosure of third-party breach)
Identity Theft Risk: Low (no financial or PII exposed)
Payment Information Risk: None
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, Corporate Documents, Hr Records, Legal Documents, , Personal Data (Unspecified Fields), Business Contact Details (Names, Emails, Phone Numbers), , Business Contact Information, Sales Notes and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Entity Name: Manpower Lansing Franchise
Entity Type: Staffing Franchise
Industry: Staffing and Recruitment
Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Customers Affected: 144,189 individuals
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Entity Name: Manpower (Lansing, Michigan franchise)
Entity Type: Staffing Agency (Franchise)
Industry: Human Resources / Staffing
Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Customers Affected: 144,189 individuals
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Entity Name: Workday
Entity Type: Public Company
Industry: Enterprise Cloud Applications (HR, Finance)
Location: Pleasanton, California, USA
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: North America
Size: Large (2.5B+ users)
Customers Affected: 2.5 billion (indirect warning issued)
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Entity Name: Small and Midsize Businesses (SMBs)
Entity Type: Businesses
Industry: Multiple
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: External Security Experts (Investigation), Equifax (Credit Monitoring And Identity Theft Protection).
Law Enforcement Notified: FBI,
Recovery Measures: Free Equifax credit monitoring and identity theft protection for affected individuals
Communication Strategy: Notification letters to affected individualsPublic statement via The RegisterData breach notification filed with Maine Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['Yes (investigation launched post-detection)', 'Yes (access revoked, safeguards added)']
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (FBI informed),
Containment Measures: Access to compromised CRM platform revoked
Remediation Measures: Added extra safeguards against similar incidents
Recovery Measures: Free credit monitoring and identity theft protection for 1 year
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure (via spokesperson)Public statement
Enhanced Monitoring: Likely (implied by 'extra safeguards')
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (public advisory issued)
Containment Measures: Isolation of compromised Salesforce instance
Remediation Measures: User advisories to strengthen account protections
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure, user notifications
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (investigation launched post-detection), Yes (access revoked, safeguards added), , Yes (public advisory issued).
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through External security experts (investigation), Equifax (credit monitoring and identity theft protection), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data, Corporate documents, Hr records, Legal documents
Number of Records Exposed: 144,189
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, passports, financial statements, contracts)
File Types Exposed: PDFs (social security cards, driver’s licenses, passports)Spreadsheets (employee hours, worksites, customer lists)Bank StatementsConfidential ContractsNon-Disclosure Agreements
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAddressesSocial Security Numbers (SSNs)Driver’s License NumbersPassport Details
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data (unspecified fields), Business contact details (names, emails, phone numbers)
Number of Records Exposed: 144,189
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal data)Low (business contact info only)
Data Exfiltration: Likely (claimed by RansomHub)Yes (but limited to contact details)
Personally Identifiable Information: YesNo (only business contacts)
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Type of Data Compromised: Business contact information, Sales notes
Sensitivity of Data: Low to Moderate (mostly public or non-sensitive)
Data Exfiltration: Yes
File Types Exposed: Contact listsSales documents
Personally Identifiable Information: No
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Added extra safeguards against similar incidents, , User advisories to strengthen account protections, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by access to compromised crm platform revoked, , isolation of compromised salesforce instance and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Data Exfiltration: ['Likely (claimed by RansomHub)']
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Free Equifax credit monitoring and identity theft protection for affected individuals, , Free credit monitoring and identity theft protection for 1 year, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuit (mentioned in stolen data),
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General (data breach notification)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Regulations Violated: Potentially state data breach laws (e.g., Michigan),
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuit (mentioned in stolen data), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Lessons Learned: Third-party systems are high-risk targets for social engineering attacks. Enterprises must enforce stricter access controls and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for third-party integrations.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Recommendations: Implement MFA for all third-party system accesses, Conduct regular security awareness training for employees, Audit and secure third-party app integrations, Monitor for unusual access patterns in third-party systemsImplement MFA for all third-party system accesses, Conduct regular security awareness training for employees, Audit and secure third-party app integrations, Monitor for unusual access patterns in third-party systemsImplement MFA for all third-party system accesses, Conduct regular security awareness training for employees, Audit and secure third-party app integrations, Monitor for unusual access patterns in third-party systemsImplement MFA for all third-party system accesses, Conduct regular security awareness training for employees, Audit and secure third-party app integrations, Monitor for unusual access patterns in third-party systems
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Third-party systems are high-risk targets for social engineering attacks. Enterprises must enforce stricter access controls and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for third-party integrations.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Source: The Register
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Data Breach Notification)
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Source: RansomHub Leak Site (Screenshots of Stolen Data)
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Source: FBI (RansomHub as Top Ransomware Variant in 2024)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Source: Hackread.com
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Source: Manpower Public Statement
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Source: Workday Public Statement
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Source: Unspecified cybersecurity news outlet
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Register, and Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Data Breach Notification), and Source: RansomHub Leak Site (Screenshots of Stolen Data), and Source: FBI (RansomHub as Top Ransomware Variant in 2024), and Source: Hackread.com, and Source: Manpower Public Statement, and Source: Workday Public Statement, and Source: Unspecified cybersecurity news outlet.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (FBI involved, franchise cooperating)
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Investigation Status: ['Ongoing (FBI involved)', 'Completed (access revoked, safeguards added)']
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (limited details disclosed)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statement Via The Register, Data Breach Notification Filed With Maine Attorney General, Public Disclosure (Via Spokesperson), Public Statement, Public disclosure and user notifications.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Customer Advisories: Notification letters sent to affected individuals offering free credit monitoring
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Customer Advisories: Free credit monitoring and identity theft protection offeredNo customer data accessed (per Workday)
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Stakeholder Advisories: Public warning issued to Gmail users
Customer Advisories: Users advised to enable 2FA and review account security settings
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Notification Letters Sent To Affected Individuals Offering Free Credit Monitoring, , Free Credit Monitoring And Identity Theft Protection Offered, No Customer Data Accessed (Per Workday), , Public warning issued to Gmail users and Users advised to enable 2FA and review account security settings.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
High Value Targets: Pii, Financial Data, Corporate Contracts,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Pii, Financial Data, Corporate Contracts,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Entry Point: Third-Party Crm Platform (Via Social Engineering),
Reconnaissance Period: ['Late December 2024 to mid-January 2025']
High Value Targets: Business Contact Databases,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Business Contact Databases,
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Entry Point: Vishing attack on employee
High Value Targets: Salesforce Instance With Business Contact Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Salesforce Instance With Business Contact Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware MAN501081325
Corrective Actions: Manpowergroup Counseling Franchisee, Implementing Safeguards To Reduce Future Risk,
Incident : Data Breach / Ransomware Attack MAN847081825
Root Causes: Social Engineering Vulnerability (Employees Tricked Into Divulging Credentials),
Corrective Actions: Added Extra Safeguards To Crm Platform,
Incident : Data Breach MAN0293702100325
Root Causes: Successful Vishing Attack, Insufficient Access Controls For Third-Party Systems,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as External Security Experts (Investigation), Equifax (Credit Monitoring And Identity Theft Protection), , Likely (Implied By 'Extra Safeguards'), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Manpowergroup Counseling Franchisee, Implementing Safeguards To Reduce Future Risk, , Added Extra Safeguards To Crm Platform, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an RansomHub, RansomHubShinyHunters and ShinyHunters.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-01-20.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on June 2025.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Information (144,189 individuals), Social Security Cards, Driver’s Licenses, Passports, Financial Statements, HR Data Analytics, Corporate Bank Statements, Employee Hours and Worksites, Customer Lists, Confidential Contracts, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Names and Addresses, , Personal data of 144,189 individuals, Basic business contact details (names, emails, phone numbers), , Business names, Contact details (emails, phone numbers), Sales notes and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Lansing Franchise Network (Independent Data Platform) and Franchise office network (Lansing, Michigan)Third-party CRM platform and Third-party Salesforce instance.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was external security experts (investigation), equifax (credit monitoring and identity theft protection), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Access to compromised CRM platform revoked and Isolation of compromised Salesforce instance.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal Information (144,189 individuals), Personal data of 144,189 individuals, Social Security Cards, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Business names, HR Data Analytics, Financial Statements, Corporate Bank Statements, Contact details (emails, phone numbers), Sales notes, Employee Hours and Worksites, Driver’s Licenses, Basic business contact details (names, emails, phone numbers), Confidential Contracts, Customer Lists, Names and Addresses and Passports.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 288.4K.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuit (mentioned in stolen data), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Third-party systems are high-risk targets for social engineering attacks. Enterprises must enforce stricter access controls and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for third-party integrations.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Audit and secure third-party app integrations, Conduct regular security awareness training for employees, Implement MFA for all third-party system accesses and Monitor for unusual access patterns in third-party systems.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Workday Public Statement, Maine Attorney General’s Office (Data Breach Notification), The Register, Unspecified cybersecurity news outlet, FBI (RansomHub as Top Ransomware Variant in 2024), RansomHub Leak Site (Screenshots of Stolen Data), Manpower Public Statement and Hackread.com.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (FBI involved, franchise cooperating).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public warning issued to Gmail users, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Notification letters sent to affected individuals offering free credit monitoring, Free credit monitoring and identity theft protection offeredNo customer data accessed (per Workday) and Users advised to enable 2FA and review account security settings.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Vishing attack on employee.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Late December 2024 to mid-January 2025.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Social engineering vulnerability (employees tricked into divulging credentials), Successful vishing attackInsufficient access controls for third-party systems.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was ManpowerGroup counseling franchiseeImplementing safeguards to reduce future risk, Added extra safeguards to CRM platform.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=manpowergroup' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
