Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)
VS
National Park ServiceNational Park Service
Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

1 parvis Pierre Laroque, SAINT ETIENNE, 42000, FR

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Travailler à l'Assurance Maladie, c'est s'engager au sein d'un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d'assurés. La Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie de l...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:215
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
National Park Service

National Park Service

1849 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20240

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nps.gov
802/1000Good

Most people know that the National Park Service cares for national parks, a network of over 420 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation. The treasures in this system – the first of its kind in the world – have been set aside by the American people to ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,176
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Park Service

National Park Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Park Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Park Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Park Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
National Park Service

National Park Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and National Park Service company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) or National Park Service ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) or National Park Service ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) and National Park Service, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cpam de la Loire (Assurance Maladie) and National Park Service, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8