Comparison Overview
Cox Communications
Cox Communications
6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. ...
A1 Telekom Austria Group
Lassallestrasse 9, Vienna, Vienna, AT, 1020
Last Update: 14/09/2026
WE ARE EMPOWERING DIGITAL LIFE We don't know what the world will look like in 2050, but we know that A1 Telekom Austria Group is geared up for current and future demands. We are a leading provider of digital services and communications solutions in Central and Eastern...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Cox Communications
A1 Telekom Austria Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A1 Telekom Austria Group in 2026.
Incident History - Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - A1 Telekom Austria Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A1 Telekom Austria Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Cox Communications
A1 Telekom Austria Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.
Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).
PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.
Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.
The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).