Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Covenant Health » COV1767361247

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COV1767361247)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-139
Company Score Before Incident769 / 1000
Company Score After Incident630 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCOV1767361247
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORUnknown
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and health information (name,...
INCIDENT DATE17/05/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Covenant Health's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Covenant Health Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Covenant Health breach identified under incident ID COV1767361247.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Covenant Health's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/covenanthealth, the number of followers: 13751, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 2700 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 769 and after the incident was 630 with a difference of -139 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Covenant Health and their customers.

On 01 July 2025, Covenant Health, Inc. disclosed Data Breach, Ransomware issues under the banner "Covenant Health Data Breach".

Covenant Health, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and health information (name, date of birth, address, SSN, medical record number, health insurance information, treatment information), with nearly 478,188 individuals (1.3 million files alleged by Qilin) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to Maine Attorney General’s Office and affected individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access to sensitive patient information, and attack vector such as Unknown (commonly involves compromised credentials) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including healthcare provider with potential exposed services, and attack vector such as Unknown (common in ransomware incidents). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including unauthorized access (common precursor to ransomware), and healthcare sector often targeted for weak credentials and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including large-scale breach suggests possible credential exposure, and healthcare systems often store credentials insecurely. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including theft of 1.3 million files (850 GB) implies extensive reconnaissance, and targeted health insurance and treatment records and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 850 GB of data exfiltrated (systematic file discovery). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including 1.3 million files (850 GB) stolen, and personal and health information compromised and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating large-scale exfiltration suggests access to shared drives. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including 850 GB of data allegedly exfiltrated by Qilin, and data later published online and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups commonly use web services for exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including qilin ransomware group claimed responsibility, and data encryption confirmed and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including ransomware often involves destructive encryption, and no mention of data recovery. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including delayed detection (discovered May 26, attack on May 18), and underreported initial impact (7,800 vs 478,188) and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including ransomware encryption (Qilin strain), and data exfiltration likely obfuscated. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (60%)
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Data Destruction (60%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (70%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)

Sources & References