Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Corporate Traveller South AfricaCorporate Traveller South Africa
VS
HertzHertz
Corporate Traveller South Africa

Corporate Traveller South Africa

299 Pendoring Road, Blackheath, Gauteng, 2119, ZA

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Established in 1999, Corporate Traveller is the founding corporate brand of Flight Centre Travel Group. We provide tailor-made travel solutions to corporate South Africa, and guarantee to save you time and money through our global negotiating strength and travel expert...

NAICS:561
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:205
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hertz

Hertz

8501 Williams Road, Estero, 33928, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.hertz.com
700/1000Moderate

Hertz is one of the world’s largest mobility companies, and through its indirect subsidiary, The Hertz Corporation, operates the Hertz, Dollar, and Thrifty vehicle rental brands throughout North America, Europe, the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, Asi...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:21,205
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Corporate Traveller South Africa

Corporate Traveller South Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hertz

Hertz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Traveller South Africa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hertz in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Corporate Traveller South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Traveller South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hertz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hertz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Corporate Traveller South Africa

Corporate Traveller South Africa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hertz

Hertz

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HER1765420281
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HER047072425

FAQ

Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa company and Hertz company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa and Hertz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa and Hertz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Corporate Traveller South Africa or Hertz ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Corporate Traveller South Africa or Hertz ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa and Hertz, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Corporate Traveller South Africa and Hertz, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1