Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinseyCorporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey
VS
ConduentConduent
Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

1 Jermyn Street, London, GB

Last Update: 05/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Corporate Performance Analytics is a digital platform for benchmarking financial performance data, developing strategies, and uncovering insights for data-driven decision-making.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Conduent

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, Florham Park, New Jersey, US, 07932

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.conduent.com
100/1000Critical

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, mac...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:37,668
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Conduent

Conduent

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Conduent has 482.52% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Conduent

Conduent

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CON1776790111
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON1772670434
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
APP1770616335

FAQ

Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey company and Conduent company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey or Conduent ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey or Conduent ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey and Conduent, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey and Conduent, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9