Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Conti Group Building Consultants » CON1766104576

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CON1766104576)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-57
Company Score Before Incident639 / 1000
Company Score After Incident582 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCON1766104576
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORUnknown (likely phishing, malware, or exploit-based)
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE29/05/2025
STATUSOngoing (Operation Endgame)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Conti Group Building Consultants's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Conti Group Building Consultants Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Conti Group Building Consultants breach identified under incident ID CON1766104576.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Conti Group Building Consultants's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/conti-group-building-consultants, the number of followers: 73, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 2 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 639 and after the incident was 582 with a difference of -57 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Conti Group Building Consultants and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Trickbot Cybercrime Cartel Operations", has drawn attention.

Russian cybercrime cartel Trickbot conducted a relentless hacking spree targeting thousands of victims, including businesses, schools, and hospitals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Thousands of systems across businesses, schools, and hospitals, and exposing True, plus an estimated financial loss of Hundreds of millions of dollars.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing (Operation Endgame).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating likely phishing, malware, or exploit-based attack vector and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unknown attack vector, but historically linked to exploits. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating trickbot malware operations targeting thousands of victims and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware-based attacks (e.g., Qakbot investigation link). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating six-year hacking campaign implies persistent access and Create or Modify System Process (T1543) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating trickbot/Conti malware infrastructure. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeting of high-value entities (hospitals, businesses). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating trickbots six-year evasion of attribution and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window (T1564.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware operations with stealth capabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data theft including payment information and PII and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeting of sensitive organizational data. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeted attacks on 428 U.S. hospitals and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration and theft of sensitive files. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating global hacking campaign across industries. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data theft including PII and payment information and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating hundreds of millions stolen over six years. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in ransomware details and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cybercrime cartel operations with global reach. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware operations linked to Trickbot/Conti and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating disruption to healthcare services and businesses. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Create or Modify System Process (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Automated Collection (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Service Stop (70%)

Sources & References