Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Contact Group (TAS) » CON1785464632

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CON1785464632)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident747 / 1000
Company Score After Incident689 / 1000
Company LinkView Contact Group (TAS) Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCON1785464632
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDScans of driver’s licenses (names,...
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Contact Group (TAS)'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Contact Group (TAS) Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Contact Group (TAS) breach identified under incident ID CON1785464632.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Contact Group (TAS)'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/contactgrouptas, the number of followers: 923, the industry type: Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 58 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 689 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Contact Group (TAS) and their customers.

Contact Group recently reported "Contact Group Hit by Dark Web Data Auction Following Alleged Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Tasmania-based technology provider Contact Group has been listed on the dark web leak site of the CMD Organization hacking group.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Scans of driver’s licenses (names, addresses, signatures, license classes, document numbers).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Declined to comment.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cMD Organization may rely on initial access brokers (IABs) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating major multi-sector supplier serving commercial, government, healthcare. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s licenses containing personal details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating scans of driver’s licenses (names, addresses, signatures, etc.) and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data stolen from multi-sector supplier. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltrated and auctioned on dark web leak site and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating auctioned on dark web (public bidding on stolen data). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on data encryption, but ransom demanded and Financial Theft (T1657) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating auctioning data for 10 bitcoin (~$600,000 USD). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (50%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Financial Theft (90%)

Sources & References