Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Condé Nast is a global media company producing the highest quality magazines and digital content. For more than 100 years, Condé Nast has been renowned as the authority on the latest trends in beauty, fashion, interiors and luxury products, and for influential reporting - from cutting-edge exposés in current affairs to truthful views on travel experiences. Condé Nast Britain continues to lead the luxury multimedia publishing industry and produces 10 magazines: Vogue, House & Garden, Tatler, The World of Interiors, GQ, Vanity Fair, Wired, Condé Nast Traveller, Glamour and GQ Style. In addition to creating the finest brands, Condé Nast Britain also leads the way in producing outstanding content across multiple platforms: Ars Technica, Condé Nast Digital, Condé Nast Contract Publishing and the Condé Nast Johansens hotel guides. The Condé Nast College of Fashion & Design opened in central London in 2013 and offers a BA (Hons) Fashion Communication Degree, a year-long Vogue Fashion Foundation Diploma and various other shorter courses. For more information, please visit: https://www.condenast.co.uk/

Condé Nast Britain A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

CNB

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

condénastbritain

Employees number:

143

Number of followers:

52,664

NAICS:

511

Industry Type:

Book and Periodical Publishing

Homepage:

condenast.co.uk

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

CON_2629505

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreCNB Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
CNB Book and Periodical Publishing
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreCNB Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
CNB Book and Periodical Publishing
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

CNB Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Condé Nast BritainBreach85412/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million *Wired.com* users on the newly launched hacking forum *Breach Stars*. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database. The hacker accused Condé Nast, *Wired*’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as *GQ* (994K), *Vogue* (1.9M), *The New Yorker* (6.8M), and *Bon Appétit* (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure. Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including *DataBreaches.net*, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by *Hackread.com* confirms the legitimacy of the leaked *Wired* data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.

Condé Nast BritainBreach100405/2019NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Condé Nast notified about 1,100 WIRED subscribers of a breach involving their payment information. They stated that an unauthorized party accessed their vendor’s systems in an attempt to acquire information. The compromised information includes names, postal and email addresses, credit/debit card numbers, security codes, and card expiration dates.

GQ, Condé Nast, Vogue, Wired, Self, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Teen Vogue and Condé Nast Traveler: Hacker Leaks 2.3M Wired.com Records, Claims 40M-User Condé Nast Breach
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 12/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million *Wired.com* users on the newly launched hacking forum *Breach Stars*. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database. The hacker accused Condé Nast, *Wired*’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as *GQ* (994K), *Vogue* (1.9M), *The New Yorker* (6.8M), and *Bon Appétit* (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure. Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including *DataBreaches.net*, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by *Hackread.com* confirms the legitimacy of the leaked *Wired* data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.

Condé Nast
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 4
Seen: 05/2019
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Condé Nast notified about 1,100 WIRED subscribers of a breach involving their payment information. They stated that an unauthorized party accessed their vendor’s systems in an attempt to acquire information. The compromised information includes names, postal and email addresses, credit/debit card numbers, security codes, and card expiration dates.

Ailogo

CNB Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for CNB

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Britain in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Britain in 2026.

Incident Types CNB vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Britain in 2026.

Incident History — CNB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

CNB Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Condé Nast is a global media company producing the highest quality magazines and digital content. For more than 100 years, Condé Nast has been renowned as the authority on the latest trends in beauty, fashion, interiors and luxury products, and for influential reporting - from cutting-edge exposés in current affairs to truthful views on travel experiences. Condé Nast Britain continues to lead the luxury multimedia publishing industry and produces 10 magazines: Vogue, House & Garden, Tatler, The World of Interiors, GQ, Vanity Fair, Wired, Condé Nast Traveller, Glamour and GQ Style. In addition to creating the finest brands, Condé Nast Britain also leads the way in producing outstanding content across multiple platforms: Ars Technica, Condé Nast Digital, Condé Nast Contract Publishing and the Condé Nast Johansens hotel guides. The Condé Nast College of Fashion & Design opened in central London in 2013 and offers a BA (Hons) Fashion Communication Degree, a year-long Vogue Fashion Foundation Diploma and various other shorter courses. For more information, please visit: https://www.condenast.co.uk/

Loading...
similarCompanies

CNB Similar Companies

Forbes

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes

newsone

CNB CyberSecurity News

September 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Meet our 30 under 30 list-makers

The bi-annual competition sets out to find the brightest young talent from across the BU community and to celebrate the achievements of...

June 27, 2025 07:00 AM
British man behind ‘IntelBroker’ hacker group charged with stealing millions

The serial hacker, allegedly part of the hacking group 'IntelBroker,' was named as Kai West, and faces sentences of up to 20 years in prison.

January 29, 2025 08:00 AM
Smiths Group Scrambling to Restore Systems Following Cyberattack

British engineering giant Smiths Group is scrambling to restore systems that were knocked offline in response to a cyberattack.

February 22, 2019 08:00 AM
Here's how GCHQ scours Huawei hardware for malicious code

A nondescript business park on the outskirts of Banbury could play a hugely important role in the UK's future security.

February 01, 2018 08:00 AM
Condé Nast Britain Names Richard Dennen Editor of Tatler Magazine

DENNEN'S DAY: Condé Nast Britain has named the Mail on Sunday journalist Richard Dennen as editor in chief of Tatler.

October 18, 2016 07:00 AM
Keeping Britain safe: how GCHQ's new cyber security agency will protect us from hackers

WIRED speaks to Ian Levy, chief technical officer of the National Centre for Cyber Security, the new government agency tasked with protecting the UK against...

September 06, 2012 12:40 PM
Working at Condé Nast

At Condé Nast, you will have the opportunity to work with our teams of award-winning journalists, editors and designers, industry icons and the best engineers...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

CNB CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Condé Nast Britain

The official website of Condé Nast Britain is http://www.condenast.co.uk.

Condé Nast Britain’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 626, reflecting their Poor security posture.

How many security badges does Condé Nast Britain’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Condé Nast Britain been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Condé Nast Britain have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Condé Nast Britain have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Condé Nast Britain comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Condé Nast Britain have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Condé Nast Britain comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Condé Nast Britain is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Condé Nast Britain have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Condé Nast Britain is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Condé Nast Britain

Condé Nast Britain operates primarily in the Book and Periodical Publishing industry.

Number of Employees at Condé Nast Britain

Condé Nast Britain employs approximately 143 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Condé Nast Britain

Condé Nast Britain presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Condé Nast Britain’s LinkedIn Followers

Condé Nast Britain’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 52,664 followers.

NAICS Classification of Condé Nast Britain

Condé Nast Britain is classified under the NAICS code 511, which corresponds to Publishing Industries (except Internet).

Condé Nast Britain’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Condé Nast Britain does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Condé Nast Britain’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Condé Nast Britain maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/condénastbritain.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Condé Nast Britain

As of January 23, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Condé Nast Britain has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Condé Nast Britain has an estimated 5,011 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Condé Nast Britain ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

How does Condé Nast Britain detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with subscriber notification..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Condé Nast Data Breach

Description: Condé Nast notified about 1,100 WIRED subscribers of a breach involving their payment information. An unauthorized party accessed their vendor’s systems in an attempt to acquire information. The compromised information includes names, postal and email addresses, credit/debit card numbers, security codes, and card expiration dates.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access

Threat Actor: Unauthorized Party

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Wired.com User Data Leak by Hacker 'Lovely'

Description: A hacker using the alias 'Lovely' leaked personal data of over 2.3 million Wired.com users, accusing Condé Nast of ignoring security warnings. The data includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, and account timestamps but no passwords or payment information. The hacker claims access to over 40 million accounts across Condé Nast properties.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-12-20

Type: Data Breach

Threat Actor: Lovely

Motivation: Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Vendor's Systems.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Data Compromised: Names, Postal and email addresses, Credit/debit card numbers, Security codes, Card expiration dates

Payment Information Risk: High

Data Compromised: 2,366,576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties

Systems Affected: Wired.com user database or shared Condé Nast identity platform

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential damage to Condé Nast and Wired.com reputation

Legal Liabilities: Potential regulatory violations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA)

Identity Theft Risk: High (exposed PII like names and email addresses)

Payment Information Risk: None (no payment data exposed)

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Payment Information, , Full Names, Email Addresses, User Ids, Display Names, Account Creation/Update Timestamps, Last Session Dates and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Entity Name: Condé Nast

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Media

Customers Affected: 1100

Entity Name: Wired.com

Entity Type: Online Magazine/Website

Industry: Media/Publishing

Location: United States

Size: Large (subsidiary of Condé Nast)

Customers Affected: 2,366,576

Entity Name: Condé Nast (Parent Company)

Entity Type: Media Conglomerate

Industry: Media/Publishing

Location: United States

Size: Enterprise

Customers Affected: Over 40 million (across multiple brands)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Communication Strategy: Subscriber Notification

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Payment information

Number of Records Exposed: 1100

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: namespostal and email addresses

Type of Data Compromised: Full names, Email addresses, User ids, Display names, Account creation/update timestamps, Last session dates

Number of Records Exposed: 2,366,576 (Wired.com); over 40 million (Condé Nast properties)

Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (PII exposed but no passwords or payment data)

Data Exfiltration: Yes (leaked on hacking forum)

Personally Identifiable Information: Full namesEmail addressesUser IDs

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR, Potential CCPA,

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Source: Hackread.com

Date Accessed: 2025-12-20

Source: DataBreaches.net

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Hackread.comDate Accessed: 2025-12-20, and Source: DataBreaches.net.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Investigation Status: Ongoing (unverified by Condé Nast)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Subscriber Notification.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Customer Advisories: Notification to Subscribers

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Notification to Subscribers.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CON202224323

Entry Point: Vendor's Systems

Reconnaissance Period: 1 month (claimed time to convince Condé Nast to fix vulnerabilities)

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Unauthorized Party and Lovely.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-12-20.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were names, postal and email addresses, credit/debit card numbers, security codes, card expiration dates, , 2,366 and576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were security codes, names, 2,366,576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties, credit/debit card numbers, postal and email addresses and card expiration dates.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 42.4M.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are DataBreaches.net and Hackread.com.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (unverified by Condé Nast).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Notification to Subscribers.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Vendor's Systems.

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was 1 month (claimed time to convince Condé Nast to fix vulnerabilities).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=condénastbritain' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge