Comparison Overview

Condé Nast Britain

VS

Forbes

Condé Nast Britain

1-2 Hanover Square , London , London, GB, W1S 1JX
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.condenast.co.uk

Condé Nast is a global media company producing the highest quality magazines and digital content. For more than 100 years, Condé Nast has been renowned as the authority on the latest trends in beauty, fashion, interiors and luxury products, and for influential reporting - from cutting-edge exposés in current affairs to truthful views on travel experiences. Condé Nast Britain continues to lead the luxury multimedia publishing industry and produces 10 magazines: Vogue, House & Garden, Tatler, The World of Interiors, GQ, Vanity Fair, Wired, Condé Nast Traveller, Glamour and GQ Style. In addition to creating the finest brands, Condé Nast Britain also leads the way in producing outstanding content across multiple platforms: Ars Technica, Condé Nast Digital, Condé Nast Contract Publishing and the Condé Nast Johansens hotel guides. The Condé Nast College of Fashion & Design opened in central London in 2013 and offers a BA (Hons) Fashion Communication Degree, a year-long Vogue Fashion Foundation Diploma and various other shorter courses. For more information, please visit: https://www.condenast.co.uk/

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Forbes

Jersey City, NJ, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849
http://www.forbes.com

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes brand today reaches more than 94 million people worldwide with its business message each month through its magazines and 37 licensed local editions around the globe, Forbes.com, TV, conferences, research, social and mobile platforms. Forbes Media’s brand extensions include conferences, real estate, education, financial services, and technology license agreements. Forbes is an equal opportunity employer.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10,065
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
Condé Nast Britain
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-magazine.jpeg
Forbes
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Condé Nast Britain
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forbes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Britain in 2026.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forbes in 2026.

Incident History — Condé Nast Britain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Condé Nast Britain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forbes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forbes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
Condé Nast Britain
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-magazine.jpeg
Forbes
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Forbes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Condé Nast Britain company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Forbes company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Condé Nast Britain company.

In the current year, Forbes company and Condé Nast Britain company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forbes company nor Condé Nast Britain company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Condé Nast Britain company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Forbes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Forbes company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Condé Nast Britain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Condé Nast Britain company nor Forbes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Condé Nast Britain company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Forbes company.

Forbes company employs more people globally than Condé Nast Britain company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Condé Nast Britain nor Forbes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References