What is the official website of ComTec Cares ?

The official website of ComTec Cares is https://comtecsystems.net/comtec-cares/.

What is ComTec Cares's cybersecurity risk score?

ComTec Cares has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 779 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has ComTec Cares experienced?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has ComTec Cares been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does ComTec Cares have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does ComTec Cares have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does ComTec Cares comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does ComTec Cares have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does ComTec Cares comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, ComTec Cares is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does ComTec Cares have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,ComTec Cares is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does ComTec Cares operate in ?

ComTec Cares operates primarily in the Philanthropic Fundraising Services industry.

How many employees does ComTec Cares have ?

ComTec Cares employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does ComTec Cares own any subsidiaries ?

ComTec Cares presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does ComTec Cares have ?

ComTec Cares's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for ComTec Cares ?

ComTec Cares is classified under the NAICS code 8132, which corresponds to Grantmaking and Giving Services.

Does ComTec Cares have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, ComTec Cares does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does ComTec Cares have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, ComTec Cares maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/comtec-cares.

How many cybersecurity incidents has ComTec Cares experienced ?

As of August 3, 2026, Rankiteo reports that ComTec Cares has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does ComTec Cares have ?

ComTec Cares has an estimated 1,811 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has ComTec Cares faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

ComTec Cares

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

779

/1000

Fair

804

/1000

Good

ComTec Cares Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

comtecsystems.net

Add Your Compliance Badge

ComTec Cares A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

ComTec Cares

ComTec Cares CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

ComTec Systems

Ransomware

100

9/2025

COM1775148591

Loading…

A.I.

ComTec Cares Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for ComTec Cares

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ComTec Cares in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ComTec Cares in 2026.

Incident Types ComTec Cares vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ComTec Cares in 2026.

Incident History - ComTec Cares (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

ComTec Cares Subsidiaries

ComTec Cares

Philanthropic Fundraising Services

Website: https://comtecsystems.net/comtec-cares/

Company Size: None employees

ComTec SystemsTelecommunications

Loading…

ComTec Cares Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

ComTec Cares CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 03, 2025 08:00 AM

Sal Nuzzo: Health care under siege — fighting foreign influence threatening Floridians' health

Florida must confront rising security risks from Chinese medical devices infiltrating care.

Read Article

July 03, 2025 07:00 AM

FDA announces software patch available for Contec, Epsimed patient monitors to address vulnerabilities

The Food and Drug Administration yesterday released a safety notice announcing a software patch is available to address cybersecurity...

Read Article

June 17, 2025 07:00 AM

Florida's AG sues Chinese maker of patient monitors, alleging cybersecurity risks

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a lawsuit against a Chinese medical device manufacturer and its Miami-based reseller, alleging deceptive...

Read Article

April 02, 2025 07:00 AM

Subcommittee on O&I Holds Hearing on Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in Legacy Medical Devices

Congressman Gary Palmer (AL-06), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, led a hearing titled Aging Technology, Emerging Threats.

Read Article

February 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Chinese medical devices are in health systems across U.S., and the government and hospitals are worried

Experts say the proliferation of Chinese health-care devices in the US medical system is a cause for concern across the entire ecosystem.

Read Article

February 03, 2025 08:00 AM

CISA, FDA warn of backdoor in Contec patient monitors

The FDA issued an alert regarding several cybersecurity vulnerabilities in Contec patient monitors, which could allow cyberthreat actors to bypass security...

Read Article

February 03, 2025 08:00 AM

Medical monitoring machines spotted stealing patient data, users warned to pull the plug ASAP

The United States Food and Drug Administration has told medical facilities and caregivers that monitor patients using Contec equipment to disconnect the...

Read Article

January 31, 2025 08:00 AM

FDA, CISA warn of backdoor in popular patient monitor used by US hospitals

The Contec CMS8000, a patient monitor made by a company based in China, has vulnerabilities in its firmware that directly expose it to...

Read Article

January 31, 2025 08:00 AM

Backdoor in Contec CMS8000 monitors may allow faulty patient readings

Agencies say firmware backdoor can cause an RCE, which could result in faulty readings on patients' vital signs.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18577

SUMMARY

An incomplete patch for CVE-2026-18556 allows for authentication bypass and account takeover in N-central Versions through 2026.3.1

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10848

SUMMARY

The OCPP 1.6 client in subsys/net/lib/ocpp parsed inbound WAMP RPC frames in parse_rpc_msg() (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp_j.c) using a hand-rolled helper, extract_string_field(), that copied the message's uid and action fields with strncpy(out_buf, token + 1, outlen - 1) and then scanned the result with strchr(out_buf, '"'). Because strncpy does not NUL-terminate the destination when the source is at least outlen - 1 (127) bytes long, the subsequent strchr reads past the 128-byte destination buffer into adjacent stack memory; if a " byte is found beyond the buffer, a one-byte out-of-bounds NUL write also occurs. A related defect in extract_payload() runs strchr/strrchr over the receive buffer, which may not be NUL-terminated when a maximal-length frame fills it. The parsed bytes come directly from the OCPP central-system server over a websocket: the reader thread fills recv_buf via websocket_recv_msg() and calls parse_rpc_msg() on each inbound DATA frame (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp.c). A malicious or compromised central server, or an on-path attacker (OCPP is commonly deployed over plain ws://), can send an RPC frame whose uid or action field is 127+ bytes with no closing quote, triggering the out-of-bounds access. The primary impact is a remotely triggerable denial of service: the unbounded scan can fault on an unmapped page, and the stray NUL write can corrupt adjacent stack state. The over-read data is not reflected to the peer, so disclosure is limited. The feature is EXPERIMENTAL and must be explicitly enabled (CONFIG_OCPP). The fix replaces the manual parser with the bounds-respecting json_mixed_arr_parse() and copies the extracted uid with an explicitly NUL-terminated buffer, eliminating both over-reads.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-9856

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in huggingface/transformers versions <=5.8.0.dev0 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary file writes via path traversal. The issue resides in the `save_pretrained()` methods of `PreTrainedTokenizerBase` and `ProcessorMixin`, where keys from the `chat_template` dictionary are used directly as filenames without proper validation. An attacker can exploit this by publishing a malicious Hugging Face Hub repository with a crafted `tokenizer_config.json` file. When a victim downloads and saves the tokenizer or processor, the attacker-controlled keys can escape the intended save directory, enabling arbitrary file writes with attacker-controlled content. This vulnerability affects multiple processors inheriting from `ProcessorMixin`, including Idefics, Florence, Gemma, Phi, and Qwen-VL.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-65321

SUMMARY

PyAthena prior to 3.35.4 contains a sql injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL by exploiting improper quote-escaping in DefaultParameterFormatter.format(), which routes DELETE and CTAS statements to the _escape_hive function that backslash-escapes single quotes rather than doubling them. Because Athena and Trino do not treat backslashes as escape characters inside string literals, attacker-supplied input such as a single quote followed by SQL syntax causes the parser to terminate the string literal prematurely, enabling data exfiltration via UNION SELECT, execution of destructive statements, and attacker-controlled CTAS destination and content.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10774

SUMMARY

Zephyr's Bluetooth Mesh subnet key management leaks one PSA Crypto key slot on every subnet-key teardown. In subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c, net_keys_create() imports the Private Beacon Key into a PSA key slot under CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS (enabled by default), but subnet_keys_destroy() guarded the matching psa_destroy_key() with CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1. That Kconfig symbol was removed when explicit Mesh 1.0.1 support was dropped, so the destroy branch became permanently dead code and the import is never balanced by a destroy. The imbalanced teardown is reached every time subnet keys are destroyed: deleting a subnet (Config Server NetKey Delete), completing a Key Refresh Procedure (which retires the old key set), and resetting/re-provisioning the node. The over-the-air triggers are processed only under the node's device key, so they are exercisable by the provisioner or network administrator that owns the node, reachable over the Bluetooth Mesh network. With the default CONFIG_MBEDTLS_PSA_KEY_SLOT_COUNT of 16, repeated add/delete or key-refresh cycles exhaust the shared PSA key-slot pool after roughly a dozen rounds. Once exhausted, bt_mesh_private_beacon_key() and thus subnet creation fail: the node can no longer add subnets or complete key refresh, and other PSA crypto consumers on the device may be starved, until the device is rebooted. The fix aligns the destroy guard with the import guard (CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS) so each slot is freed.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

0.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…