Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COM1780958480)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Comprehensive Pain Specialists's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Comprehensive Pain Specialists Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Comprehensive Pain Specialists breach identified under incident ID COM1780958480.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Comprehensive Pain Specialists's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/comprehensive-pain-specialists, the number of followers: 1390, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 164 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 634 with a difference of -122 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Comprehensive Pain Specialists and their customers.
On 14 May 2026, NJ Pain Care Specialists LLC disclosed Data Breach, Ransomware issues under the banner "NJ Pain Care Specialists Data Breach".
NJ Pain Care Specialists LLC reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to its systems in February 2025.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Limited number of systems and servers, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI).
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public notice, dedicated contact line, and mailing address for inquiries.
The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Monitor accounts and credit reports, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Guidance on monitoring accounts and credit reports, dedicated contact line (732-720-0247), and mailing address for inquiries.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed a limited number of systems and servers and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity was identified within the company’s network. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group *Lynx* claimed responsibility for the attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems containing PII and PHI. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, addresses, dates of birth, medical record numbers compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating protected health information (PHI) may have been compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exfiltrating sensitive data between February 25 and 28, 2025. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group *Lynx* claimed responsibility for the attack. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity was identified within the company’s network. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Comprehensive Pain Specialists Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/comprehensive-pain-specialists/incident/COM1780958480
- Comprehensive Pain Specialists CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/comprehensive-pain-specialists
- Comprehensive Pain Specialists Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/com1780958480-nj-pain-care-specialists-llc-ransomware-february-2025/
- Comprehensive Pain Specialists CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/comprehensive-pain-specialists/history
- Comprehensive Pain Specialists CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/nj-pain-care-specialists-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf