Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COM1784053418)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Compass Psychology Finland's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Compass Psychology Finland Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Compass Psychology Finland breach identified under incident ID COM1784053418.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Compass Psychology Finland's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compasspsychologyfinland, the number of followers: 1830, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 20 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 672 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Compass Psychology Finland and their customers.
Vastaamo recently reported "Vastaamo Psychotherapy Data Breach and Extortion Case", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Finnish hacker Aleksanteri Kivimäki was convicted for aggravated data breach, attempted extortion, and unlawful distribution of private information tied to the 2018 hack of psychotherapy provider Vastaamo.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Confidential therapy records, with nearly 33000 records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Closed (conviction upheld).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 2018 hack of psychotherapy provider Vastaamo and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacker extorted the company before demanding ransoms. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating confidential therapy records exposed (33,000 patients) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating high sensitivity of mental health records accessed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating therapy records, personally identifiable information compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating psychotherapy provider Vastaamos records accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed (33,000 records) and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating confidential therapy records leaked online. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating extortion demands made (ransomware implied) and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating psychological and financial damage reported. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacker accessed therapy records across patients. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating extortion demands sent to thousands of patients. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Compass Psychology Finland Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/compasspsychologyfinland/incident/COM1784053418
- Compass Psychology Finland CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/compasspsychologyfinland
- Compass Psychology Finland Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/com1784053418-vastaamo-breach-february-2026/
- Compass Psychology Finland CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/compasspsychologyfinland/history
- Compass Psychology Finland CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://therecord.media/finland-issues-wanted-notice-for-hacker-vastaamo-breach
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf