Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

COMO Point Yamu, PhuketCOMO Point Yamu, Phuket
VS
MGM Resorts InternationalMGM Resorts International
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

225 Moo 7, Paklok, Talang, Phuket 83110, TH

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile

Our Phuket resort, with some of COMO's most striking pool villas, sits on the tip of Cape Yamu, giving magnificent views of Phang Nga Bay. The playful interiors are by Paola Navone — a tour-de-force in modern, location-sensitive design on an island imbued with a rich Th...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MGM Resorts International

MGM Resorts International

840 Grier Drive, Las Vegas, 89119, US

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.mgmresorts.com
100/1000Critical

The resorts and casinos of MGM Resorts International™ are some of the most famous in the world. Our 28 destinations are renowned for their winning combination of quality entertainment, luxurious facilities, and exceptional customer service. We are actively expanding o...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:26,464
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MGM Resorts International

MGM Resorts International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COMO Point Yamu, Phuket in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

MGM Resorts International has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MGM Resorts International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGM Resorts International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MGM Resorts International

MGM Resorts International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHEGAS1776335039
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MGMCAEORAWYN1771962331
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MEREQUUNIMAEMGMGOOTOYSNOALLORARIPTIC1775528897

FAQ

Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and MGM Resorts International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and MGM Resorts International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and MGM Resorts International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket or MGM Resorts International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket or MGM Resorts International ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and MGM Resorts International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and MGM Resorts International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-15511
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function system_wl_upload_pic_file of the file /usr/bin/webmgnt of the component FastCGI Backend. This manipulation of the argument filename causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15510
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. Affected is the function Setting::saveSetting of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15509
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. This impacts the function editUser/addUser of the component JSON-RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument role leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15508
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Helicone ai-gateway up to 0.2.0-beta.30. This affects the function build_target_url of the file ai-gateway/src/dispatcher/service.rs of the component AWS Metadata Service. Executing a manipulation of the argument extracted_path_and_query can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15507
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8