Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Columbia Orthopaedic Group » COL1779834393

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COL1779834393)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-121
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident635 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCOL1779834393
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2025
STATUSUnder review

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Columbia Orthopaedic Group's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Columbia Orthopaedic Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Columbia Orthopaedic Group breach identified under incident ID COL1779834393.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Columbia Orthopaedic Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/columbia-orthopaedic-group, the number of followers: 737, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 145 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 635 with a difference of -121 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Columbia Orthopaedic Group and their customers.

Columbia Orthopaedic Group recently reported "LockBit Claims Responsibility for Potential Columbia Orthopaedic Group Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The ransomware group LockBit has claimed responsibility for a suspected cyberattack targeting Columbia Orthopaedic Group, a medical provider offering surgical and non-surgical orthopedic care in Columbia, Missouri.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under review.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit ransomware group claimed responsibility for cyberattack and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare providers frequently targeted via compromised credentials. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit ransomware strain implicated in the attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare sector often targeted for credential harvesting and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal or medical information exposed suggests credential theft. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit likely conducted internal reconnaissance post-access. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare networks often lack segmentation, enabling lateral spread. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal or medical information compromised in the attack. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit known for data exfiltration prior to encryption. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit ransomware strain implicated in the attack and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware typically disables recovery mechanisms. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit uses C2 channels for data exfiltration and encryption. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)

Sources & References