Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COI1785795951)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Coinkite Inc.'s Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Coinkite Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Coinkite Inc. breach identified under incident ID COI1785795951.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Coinkite Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/coinkite, the number of followers: 1111, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 5 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 737 with a difference of -27 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Coinkite Inc. and their customers.
Coinkite recently reported "Coldcard Hardware Wallet Breach Results in $88 Million Bitcoin Theft", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Canadian cryptocurrency hardware wallet manufacturer Coinkite destroyed its remaining inventory of Coldcard devices after a firmware vulnerability led to the theft of over $88 million in bitcoin from customers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Coldcard hardware wallets, and exposing Cryptocurrency wallet private keys/access, with nearly 4,585 wallet addresses records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $88.6 million.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Halted shipments of affected devices, destroyed remaining inventory, and began remediation that includes Released patched firmware update, while recovery efforts such as Urged users to retain compromised devices for potential fund recovery continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public advisory to users, social media updates.
The case underscores how Ongoing (law enforcement coordination), teams are taking away lessons such as AI-assisted code reviews may accelerate vulnerability discovery by attackers; high-value targets require enhanced protection; firmware security requires rigorous testing, and recommending next steps like Enhance firmware security audits, implement multi-layered security for high-value wallets, improve incident response coordination with law enforcement, and consider victim compensation frameworks, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Coinkite advised users to update firmware and retain compromised devices for potential recovery.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating firmware vulnerability led to the theft of over $88 million and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating firmware vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cryptocurrency wallet private keys/access compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating funds siphoned from 4,585 wallet addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating $88.6 million in bitcoin stolen from customers and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Symmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cryptocurrency funds transferred out of wallets. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating funds irrecoverable post-theft (cryptocurrency nature) and Financial Theft (T1657) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating $88.6 million in bitcoin stolen. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Org Information (T1591) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers studied victim wallets in advance and Gather Victim Host Information (T1592) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeted high-value wallets early in the campaign. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating latent firmware flaw exploited. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Coinkite Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/coinkite/incident/COI1785795951
- Coinkite Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/coinkite
- Coinkite Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/coi1785795951-coinkite-vulnerability-march-2021/
- Coinkite Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/coinkite/history
- Coinkite Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://therecord.media/bitcoin-theft-coldcard-cyberattack
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf