Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Coca-Cola Europacific Partners » COC1770775171

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COC1770775171)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-70
Company Score Before Incident803 / 1000
Company Score After Incident733 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCOC1770775171
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORcredential harvesting, Active Directory exploitation, SaaS platform exploitation
DATA EXPOSEDpersonally identifiable information (PII), employee...
INCIDENT DATE21/05/2025
STATUSongoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Coca-Cola Europacific Partners breach identified under incident ID COC1770775171.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/coca-cola-europacific-partners, the number of followers: 698202, the industry type: Manufacturing and the number of employees: 26871 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 803 and after the incident was 733 with a difference of -70 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Coca-Cola Europacific Partners and their customers.

Coca-Cola recently reported "Coca-Cola and Bottling Partner Hit by Dual Cyberattacks from Everest and Gehenna Groups", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Coca-Cola and its bottling partner, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP), are grappling with separate cyberattack claims from two distinct threat groups.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting HR systems and Salesforce dashboard, and exposing personally identifiable information (PII), employee records and customer support logs, with nearly ['959 (employee records)', '23 million+ (Salesforce records)'] records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating credential harvesting and Active Directory exploitation and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating saaS platform exploitation (Salesforce dashboard). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gang (Everest) listed Coca-Cola as a victim. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating credential harvesting and Active Directory exploitation and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hR records, visa/passport scans, salary details compromised. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 959 employee records (PII) leaked, including HR data and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce dashboard breach (23M+ records exfiltrated). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 7.5M Salesforce records, 9.5M customer cases, 6M contacts stolen and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce environment breach (52GB of customer service cases). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 23M+ records exfiltrated, samples shared on breach forum and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data leak for financial gain via Telegram solicitations. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating everest ransomware gang listed Coca-Cola as a victim and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat groups released screenshots of internal documents. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential harvesting and Active Directory exploitation and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating saaS platforms like Salesforce often lack robust logging. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (70%)
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (80%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Hide Artifacts (60%)

Sources & References