Comparison Overview

Coach

VS

Tommy Hilfiger

Coach

10 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Coach was founded in 1941 as a family-run workshop. In a Manhattan loft, six artisans handcrafted a collection of leather goods using skills handed down from generation to generation. Discerning consumers soon began to seek out the quality and unique nature of Coach craftsmanship. Now greatly expanded, Coach is a modern American luxury brand with a rich heritage of craftsmanship and New York style. We continue to maintain the highest standards for materials and workmanship. Coach's exceptional workforce remains committed to carefully upholding the principles of quality and integrity that define the company. We attribute the prominence of the Coach brand to the unique combination of our original American attitude and design, our heritage of fine leather goods and custom fabrics, our superior product quality and durability, and our commitment to customer service.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 12,832
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tommy Hilfiger

Danzigerkade 165, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1013, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

TOMMY HILFIGER is one of the world’s leading designer lifestyle brands creating a platform that inspires the modern American spirit, while committing to wasting nothing and welcoming all. Founded in 1985, Tommy Hilfiger delivers premium styling, quality and value to consumers worldwide under the TOMMY HILFIGER and TOMMY JEANS brands, with a breadth of collections including HILFIGER COLLECTION, TOMMY HILFIGER TAILORED, men’s, women’s and kids’ sportswear, denim, accessories, and footwear. In addition, the brand is licensed for a range of products, including fragrances, eyewear, watches and home furnishings. Founder Tommy Hilfiger remains the company’s Principal Designer and provides leadership and direction for the design process. Tommy Hilfiger, which was acquired by PVH Corp. in 2010, is a global apparel and retail company with more than 16,000 associates worldwide. With the support of strong global consumer recognition, Tommy Hilfiger has built an extensive distribution network in over 100 countries and more than 2,000 retail stores throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. Global retail sales of the TOMMY HILFIGER brand were US $9.2 billion in 2019.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 11,534
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coach.jpeg
Coach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tommy-hilfiger.jpeg
Tommy Hilfiger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coach
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tommy Hilfiger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coach in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tommy Hilfiger in 2026.

Incident History — Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tommy Hilfiger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tommy Hilfiger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coach.jpeg
Coach
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tommy-hilfiger.jpeg
Tommy Hilfiger
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Coach company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tommy Hilfiger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tommy Hilfiger company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Coach company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tommy Hilfiger company and Coach company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tommy Hilfiger company nor Coach company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tommy Hilfiger company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Coach company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tommy Hilfiger company nor Coach company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coach company nor Tommy Hilfiger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tommy Hilfiger company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coach company.

Coach company employs more people globally than Tommy Hilfiger company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coach nor Tommy Hilfiger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.