Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)
VS
Under ArmourUnder Armour
Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

17th floor, Times Square Building, 246 Sukhumvit Rd, Khlong Toei, Bangkok, Bangkok, 10110, TH

Last Update: 31/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://th.club21.com
763/1000Fair

A PROGRESSIVE APPROACH TO MODERN LUXURY Established in 1972, Club 21 is Asia’s leading purveyor of luxury fashion. Our experience in market development, brand guardianship, wholesale distribution, sourcing, and vertical retail extends over 250 brands across nearly 400 s...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:148
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Under Armour

Under Armour

101 Performance Dr, Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21230

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
100/1000Critical

Under Armour is obsessed with being better, stronger, and more focused than anyone else out there. Our mission: to make athletes better. Our vision: to inspire you with performance solutions you never knew you needed and can’t imagine living without. Our values d...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:12,755
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Under Armour

Under Armour

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

Under Armour has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Under Armour (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Under Armour cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Under Armour

Under Armour

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UND1769117511
🔒 Incident : Breach
UND1769174822
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UND3492734111825

FAQ

Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) company and Under Armour company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) and Under Armour, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) and Under Armour, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) or Under Armour ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) or Under Armour ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) and Under Armour, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Club21 Thailand (part of the COMO Group) and Under Armour, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2