Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cloud Software Group » PROCLO1781871843

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PROCLO1781871843)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident768 / 1000
Company Score After Incident766 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPROCLO1781871843
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of vulnerabilities, Legitimate remote access tools, Credential theft
DATA EXPOSEDStolen data leaked on leak...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cloud Software Group's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cloud Software Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cloud Software Group breach identified under incident ID PROCLO1781871843.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cloud Software Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudsoftwaregroup, the number of followers: 37383, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 9661 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 768 and after the incident was 766 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cloud Software Group and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "INC Ransomware Emerges as a Top Global Threat, Targeting Critical Sectors with Rust-Based Encryptors", has drawn attention.

Since its emergence in mid-2023, INC ransomware has rapidly evolved into one of the most prolific ransomware operations, claiming over 800 victims worldwide.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows and Linux/ESXi, and exposing Stolen data leaked on leak site.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2023-3519 (Citrix NetScaler RCE), CVE-2023-4966 (Citrix Bleed) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential theft targeting salted DPAPI-encrypted Veeam backups. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rust-based Windows and Linux/ESXi encryptors deployed and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating use of PsKill to disable endpoint defenses. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate remote access tools (AnyDesk, ScreenConnect, TeamViewer). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of CVE-2023-3519, CVE-2023-4966 for RCE. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating rust-based encryptors for cross-platform evasion, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating psKill used to disable endpoint defenses, and Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate tools (CobaltStrike, AnyDesk) blended into IT activity. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential theft targeting salted DPAPI-encrypted Veeam backups. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating linux/ESXi encryptor distinguishes local disks from network shares. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of Citrix, WhatsUp Gold vulnerabilities for RCE and Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating use of AnyDesk, ScreenConnect, TeamViewer for remote access. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltrated via rclone and 7-Zip before encryption. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Ingress Tool Transfer (T1105) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate tools (CobaltStrike) used for C2 and Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating use of remote access tools (AnyDesk, TeamViewer) for C2. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltrated via rclone and 7-Zip; double extortion tactic. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (100%), supported by evidence indicating rust-based encryptors for Windows/Linux/ESXi; partial encryption and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating windows variant targets Veeam backup deployments. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (90%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (80%)
Masquerading (80%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Command and Control
Ingress Tool Transfer (80%)
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (100%)
Inhibit System Recovery (80%)

Sources & References