Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AMACLONPM1786444537)

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including malicious VS Code extensions disguised as Solidity Pro, and npm package `ascii-fetcher` with malicious dependency and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including developers installed malicious VS Code extensions, and npm package executed hidden commands during installation. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript (T1059.007) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including extensions executed obfuscated JavaScript payloads, and npm package used `child_process.exec` for silent execution and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including delayed activation hours/days after installation, and developers unknowingly executed malicious extensions. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Browser Extensions (T1176) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including malicious VS Code extensions persisted on developer machines, and extensions targeted VS Code forks (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including heavy obfuscation, splitting strings across IIFEs, and clean intermediate versions to build trust and Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion (T1497.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including delayed activation hours/days after installation, and evasion of short-term sandboxing. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including harvested GitHub tokens, AWS keys, wallet seeds, SSH keys, and collected 1Password MFA tokens and URL credentials and Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (T1555.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen URL credentials and wallet data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including collected source control tokens, cloud credentials, wallet data, and sSH private keys and 1Password MFA tokens stolen and Clipboard Data (T1115) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating delayed-activation clipboard stealer swapped crypto addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exfiltrated stolen data via Telegram bot, and cloudflare Workers used for payload delivery. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen cloud credentials could enable unauthorized resource use and Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aWS keys and Cloudflare tokens stolen, risking cloud data access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.