Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CJ OliveNetworksCJ OliveNetworks
VS
Gainwell TechnologiesGainwell Technologies
CJ OliveNetworks

CJ OliveNetworks

용산구 한강대로 366 (동자동) , 서울특별시, 04323, KR

Last Update: 27/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

CJ올리브네트웍스는 1995년 창립이래 생활∙문화 기반의 종합 IT서비스를 성공적으로 제공함으로써 고객 만족과 가치를 실현하고 있으며, 고객의 신뢰와 지지를 바탕으로 견실하고 안정적인 성장을 지속해오고 있습니다. 지난 25여년 간 IT시스템 구축 및 서비스로 축적된 경험과 노하우를 바탕으로 CJ그룹의 디지털 전환(Digital Transformation)을 위한 계열사 디지털 혁신을 주도하고 있으며 스마트스토어, AI팩토리, 빅데이터, 블록체인 등 4차 산업혁명 시대에 경쟁력있...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:755
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

United States, US

Last Update: 22/05/2026

View Profile
649/1000Poor

For 50 years, our nation’s federal Medicaid program has worked to improve the health, safety and well-being of America’s most vulnerable populations: low-income families, women and children, seniors, and those with disabilities. With positive health and cost outcomes th...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,397
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CJ OliveNetworks

CJ OliveNetworks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CJ OliveNetworks in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Gainwell Technologies has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CJ OliveNetworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CJ OliveNetworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CJ OliveNetworks

CJ OliveNetworks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HARGAISOC1779481525
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI1992519092625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI115225522

FAQ

Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks and Gainwell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks and Gainwell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CJ OliveNetworks or Gainwell Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CJ OliveNetworks or Gainwell Technologies ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks and Gainwell Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CJ OliveNetworks and Gainwell Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA