Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » City of Acworth, Georgia » CIT1782066232

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CIT1782066232)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-74
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident686 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCIT1782066232
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE07/06/2026
STATUSongoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of City of Acworth, Georgia's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts City of Acworth, Georgia Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the City of Acworth, Georgia breach identified under incident ID CIT1782066232.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of City of Acworth, Georgia's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cityofacworthga, the number of followers: 1347, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 117 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 686 with a difference of -74 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on City of Acworth, Georgia and their customers.

On 14 June 2024, City of Acworth disclosed issues under the banner "Cybersecurity Incident Disrupts City of Acworth Systems".

On June 8, the city of Acworth, Georgia, detected a cybersecurity incident that disrupted certain computer systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting certain computer systems.

In response, while recovery efforts such as all systems had been fully restored continue.

The case underscores how ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident that disrupted certain computer systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted certain computer systems (implied remote access). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident (nature undisclosed, possible user action). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted certain computer systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential exposure of sensitive data remains unclear. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating incident detected, but few details disclosed (possible evasion). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (30%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (30%)

Sources & References