Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Citrix » CITPRO1783931784

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CITPRO1783931784)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident310 / 1000
Company Score After Incident306 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCITPRO1783931784
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORInternet-exposed Storage Zone Controllers
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE09/07/2026
STATUSActive investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Citrix's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Citrix Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Citrix breach identified under incident ID CITPRO1783931784.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Citrix's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/citrix, the number of followers: 586262, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 4219 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 310 and after the incident was 306 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Citrix and their customers.

On 10 July 2024, Progress Software disclosed Security Threat issues under the banner "Progress Software Orders Emergency Shutdown of ShareFile Storage Zone Controllers Amid Security Threat".

Progress Software has instructed customers to immediately take offline all Windows servers running ShareFile Storage Zone Controllers, citing a 'credible external security threat.' The company disabled access to affected accounts as a precautionary measure while collaborating...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting ShareFile Storage Zone Controllers.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Disabled access to affected accounts, mandated shutdown of Storage Zone Controllers, and began remediation that includes Advised customers to verify software versions (5.12.4 or later, or any 6.x release), and stakeholders are being briefed through Advisory on Reddit and company status page.

The case underscores how Active investigation, and recommending next steps like Keep Storage Zone Controllers offline until further notice, verify software versions, preserve logs, and scan for unauthorized .aspx files, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Customers advised to take Storage Zone Controllers offline and follow security recommendations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including storage Zone Controllers are typically exposed to the internet, and credible external security threat and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating storage Zone Controller...allows organizations to retain files on their own infrastructure. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat may involve...stolen credentials and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating scan for unauthorized .aspx files in web directories and storage paths. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating scan for unauthorized .aspx files in web directories. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating progress disabled access to affected accounts as a precautionary measure and Masquerading (T1036) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating scan for unauthorized .aspx files. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of unauthorized access to ShareFile accounts or cloud-stored data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating storage Zone Controllers marked as not operational and Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating mandated shutdown of Storage Zone Controllers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
External Remote Services (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (60%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (80%)
Masquerading (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)
Service Stop (90%)

Sources & References