Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cirium Japan (シリウム)Cirium Japan (シリウム)
VS
KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesKLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Cirium Japan (シリウム)

Cirium Japan (シリウム)

東麻布1-9-15, 東麻布1丁目ビル7階, 港区, 東京都, JP, 106-0044

Last Update: 12/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cirium.com/jp/
752/1000Fair

Ciriumは「航空業界・旅行業界は、知識と情報を効率的に共有することによってさらなる力をつけることができる」という考え方から出発しました。 現在、Ciriumは世界中の金融、 航空宇宙、旅行、政府機関、航空会社をはじめとした各業界のリーダーに、データと分析ソリューションを提供しています。スケジュールや飛行ルートはもちろん、機材仕様や乗客記録番号まで、300テラバイト以上ものすべてを網羅したデータを日々管理しているのです。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tR8VXlzWvo

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://klmf.ly/R05uLo
738/1000Moderate

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:22,827
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cirium Japan (シリウム)

Cirium Japan (シリウム)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cirium Japan (シリウム) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cirium Japan (シリウム) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cirium Japan (シリウム) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cirium Japan (シリウム)

Cirium Japan (シリウム)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM304080925
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM2289123

FAQ

Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cirium Japan (シリウム) or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cirium Japan (シリウム) or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cirium Japan (シリウム) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8