Comparison Overview
Cinnober Financial Technology

Cinnober Financial Technology
N/A
Last Update: 08/03/2026
Cinnober is now a part of Nasdaq. Cinnober is a leading provider of trading and clearing technology, serving exchanges and clearinghouses globally. Our multi-asset class solutions are used by some of the world’s most demanding financial marketplaces to deliver mission...

Aon
122 Leadenhall Street, London, GB, EC3V 4AN
Last Update: 07/10/2026
We exist to shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. Through actionable analytic insight, globally integrated Risk Capital and Human Capital expertise, and locally relevant solutions, our colleagues provide clients in ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cinnober Financial Technology







Aon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cinnober Financial Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Aon has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Cinnober Financial Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cinnober Financial Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cinnober Financial Technology

Aon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.