Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain » CIE1770330826

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CIE1770330826)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-20
Company Score Before Incident746 / 1000
Company Score After Incident726 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCIE1770330826
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORInsecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal records, email addresses, enrollment...
INCIDENT DATE04/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain breach identified under incident ID CIE1770330826.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cienciagob, the number of followers: 141599, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 594 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 726 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and their customers.

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities) recently reported "Spanish Ministry of Science Hit by Cyberattack, Disrupting Critical Services", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades) has partially shut down its IT systems following a suspected cyberattack, disrupting key services for researchers, universities, and students.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Ministry’s IT systems, electronic headquarters, and exposing Personal records, email addresses, enrollment applications, official documents.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Partial shutdown of IT systems, suspension of administrative procedures, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice on website assuring protection of affected users' rights, extension of deadlines.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notice on ministry website regarding extended deadlines and protection of rights.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating gaining admin-level access to the ministry’s systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Credential Access (T1212) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating iDOR vulnerability exploited to access admin-level systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating personal records, email addresses, enrollment applications compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating leaked data samples on underground forums as proof of breach. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating partial shutdown of IT systems, suspension of administrative procedures and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disruption of key services for researchers, universities, and students. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Credential Access
Exploitation for Credential Access (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (70%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References