Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CIC Réseaux en Île-de-FranceCIC Réseaux en Île-de-France
VS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

6, Avenue de Provence, Paris, 75009, FR

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cic.fr
755/1000Fair

Banque régionale de proximité, le CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France couvre 7 départements : l’Essonne, les Hauts-de-Seine, Paris, la Seine-Saint-Denis, le Val-de-Marne, le Val-d’Oise et les Yvelines. Il forme un réseau de 300 points de vente. Ses 2 000 collaborateurs accom...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:403
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Gustav Mahlerlaan 10, Amsterdam, NL, 1082PP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.abnamro.nl
800/1000Good

Welkom op het LinkedIn-account van ABN AMRO. We staan 24/7 klaar om jouw vragen te beantwoorden. Onze taak is altijd om de klant te ondersteunen op het moment dat het er echt op aankomt. Dat is onze verantwoordelijkheid. Dat maakt ons relevant. En wat er vandaag de dag...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:25,645
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABN AMRO Bank N.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France or ABN AMRO Bank N.V. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France or ABN AMRO Bank N.V. ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CIC Réseaux en Île-de-France and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1