Comparison Overview

Chiltern Open Air Museum

VS

National Palace Museum

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Newland Park, Gorelands Lane, Chalfont St Giles, England, HP8 4AB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Chiltern Open Air Museum was founded in 1976 with the aim of rescuing threatened buildings. More than thirty historic building have now been saved and rebuilt at the site, and there are more in store. The Museum only accepts buildings that would otherwise be demolished. The Museum’s collection focuses on vernacular buildings – the past houses and workplaces of ordinary people that are gradually disappearing from the landscape. In the Chilterns, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty on London’s doorstep, the pressures of redevelopment are particularly great. Chiltern Open Air Museum preserves a heritage that would otherwise have been lost. The Museum is a registered charity and receives no regular grants towards its running costs or capital projects. We are grateful for the fantastic support of over 200 volunteers and the Friends of the Museum Association.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Palace Museum

111, TW
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 800 and 849

Founding of the National Palace Museum The collection of cultural artifacts held by the National Palace Museum is composed of an enormous treasure trove of objects inherited from the previous Sung, Yüan, Ming and Ch'ing dynasties. When the Republic of China was first founded, these imperial treasures had remained within the Forbidden City with the last Ch'ing Emperor Pu Yi, but countless works of art were lost either because they were granted by Pu Yi as presents, because they were borrowed by his past noblemen, or because they were pledged to pawnbrokers or stolen. In 1914 the Republic of China Government relocated the cultural artifacts preserved at the Rehe Imperial Summer Retreat and the Shenyang Former Palace to the outer court of the Forbidden City, and made them available for public viewing at an Exhibition Office of Ancient Artifacts. In 1924 Pu Yi moved out of the Forbidden City, and the Government formed a "Committee for the Disposition of Ch'ing Imperial Possessions" to reorganize the invaluable artifacts stored within the Palace. On October 10, 1925 on National Day, the National Palace Museum was officially inaugurated to preserve the imperial collections and palatial treasures from the various Chinese dynasties, so that all members of the public and future generations will henceforth be able to freely enter the Palace to admire this cultural inheritance of humankind. During the first years of the National Palace Museum, a board of directors was set up as the decision-making and supervisory organ, which supervised over a subordinate board of executive directors, the two separate departments of Antiquities and Books, as well as the General Affairs Office. Over the years dramatic political changes ensued, and the National Palace Museum was in turn governed by the Maintenance Officer, Preservation Committee, Maintenance Committee and a Management Committee.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
National Palace Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chiltern Open Air Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Palace Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chiltern Open Air Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Palace Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Chiltern Open Air Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chiltern Open Air Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Palace Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Palace Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
National Palace Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Palace Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Palace Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chiltern Open Air Museum company.

In the current year, National Palace Museum company and Chiltern Open Air Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Palace Museum company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Palace Museum company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Palace Museum company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor National Palace Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor National Palace Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Palace Museum company employs more people globally than Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor National Palace Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H