Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cherry Health » CHE1781929626

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CHE1781929626)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-131
Company Score Before Incident693 / 1000
Company Score After Incident562 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCHE1781929626
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal details (names, addresses, phone...
INCIDENT DATE18/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cherry Health's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cherry Health Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cherry Health breach identified under incident ID CHE1781929626.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cherry Health's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cherryhealthmi, the number of followers: 3511, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 491 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 693 and after the incident was 562 with a difference of -131 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cherry Health and their customers.

On 19 April 2026, Cherry Health (Cherry Street Services) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cherry Health Data Breach Affecting Over 184,000 Individuals".

Michigan-based healthcare provider Cherry Health disclosed a data breach involving unauthorized access to its network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal details (names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers), Healthcare data (health insurance IDs, patient ID numbers, provider names, service dates), with nearly 184000 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications to impacted individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notifications to impacted individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its network, and days-long network outage suspected to be ransomware and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated sensitive data. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including ransomware attack, and days-long network outage suspected to be ransomware. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its network, and data exfiltration confirmed. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating accessed and exfiltrated sensitive data including SSNs and health IDs. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including ransomware attack, and investigation supported by third-party specialists and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including days-long network outage, and unauthorized access to network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, health insurance IDs compromised and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal and healthcare data exfiltrated. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth compromised and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare data including provider names and service dates exfiltrated. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal details and healthcare data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating health insurance IDs, patient ID numbers, provider names exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated sensitive data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting over 184,000 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including ransomware attack, and days-long network outage and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating network outage suspected to be ransomware. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (50%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Data Destruction (40%)

Sources & References