Checkout.com
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
checkout
Website:
Employees number:
2,214
Number of followers:
262,397
NAICS:
52
Industry Type:
Homepage:
checkout.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
CHE_3118574
Scan Status:
In-progress
Checkout.com Company CyberSecurity Posture
checkout.com
Checkout.com is a financial technology company that delivers a high-performance payments platform. Enterprise and scaling businesses use our cloud-based platform to process payments, send payouts, and manage card programs. Checkout.com is headquartered in London, with offices in New York, Paris, Dubai, Hong Kong, and other locations across six continents. Customers include global brands such as Sony, SHEIN, Wise, Patreon, and GE HealthCare.
Checkout.com A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Checkout.com Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 600 and 649
Checkout.com
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Checkout.com Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Checkout.com
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Checkout.com Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
Checkout.com
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Checkout.com was targeted by the cybercriminal group **ShinyHunters** in early November 2025 via a **ransomware attack** exploiting a decommissioned third-party cloud storage system. The breach exposed **internal operational documents and merchant onboarding materials from 2020 and earlier**, affecting **less than 25% of its current merchant base**. While **no live payment systems, merchant funds, or card numbers were compromised**, the incident involved unauthorized access to legacy data. The company **refused to pay the ransom**, instead donating the demanded amount to **Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Oxford Cyber Security Center** to combat cybercrime. Checkout.com emphasized **transparency, accountability, and collaboration with law enforcement**, while contacting impacted customers and regulators. The breach highlighted vulnerabilities in legacy system decommissioning but did not disrupt core financial operations or expose sensitive financial data.
Checkout.com
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: UK-based payment services provider **Checkout.com** experienced a security breach involving its **legacy third-party cloud file storage system**, compromised by the **ShinyHunters extortion group**. The attackers demanded a ransom, which the company refused to pay directly. Instead, Checkout.com redirected the demanded amount to **Carnegie Mellon University** and the **University of Oxford Cyber Security Center** to fund cybercrime research. The incident highlights risks associated with third-party cloud vulnerabilities, exposing potential data leaks or operational disruptions. While the company avoided direct ransom payment, the attack underscores the persistent threat of **ransomware-driven extortion** targeting financial service providers. The breach’s scope—whether customer or internal data was accessed—remains undisclosed, but the involvement of a high-profile threat actor suggests significant exposure risks. The decision to fund research rather than pay ransom aligns with ethical cybersecurity practices but does not eliminate the initial compromise’s impact on trust and system integrity.
Checkout.com Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Checkout.com
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)
Checkout.com has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Checkout.com has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Checkout.com vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Checkout.com reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Checkout.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Checkout.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Checkout.com Company Subsidiaries
Checkout.com is a financial technology company that delivers a high-performance payments platform. Enterprise and scaling businesses use our cloud-based platform to process payments, send payouts, and manage card programs. Checkout.com is headquartered in London, with offices in New York, Paris, Dubai, Hong Kong, and other locations across six continents. Customers include global brands such as Sony, SHEIN, Wise, Patreon, and GE HealthCare.
Loading...
Checkout.com Similar Companies
Westpac Group
From rescue helicopters to signing the Equator Principles, from paying super during parental leave to adding 'Touch ID' biometric technology to our banking apps and being first on the scene with a helping hand in times of crisis... we have a proud history of stepping up to be first for our customer
From gaining new experiences in different roles to acquiring fresh knowledge and skills – at UBS we believe that you should never stop growing and learning because life never stops teaching. We know that it's our people – with their unique backgrounds, skills, experience levels and interests – who d
Australia’s leading provider of financial services including retail, premium, business and institutional banking, funds management, superannuation, insurance, investment and sharebroking products and services. We are a business with more than 800,000 shareholders and over 52,000 employees. We offer
KPMG US
KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 75+ offices and more than 40,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our size and strength make us muc
FactSet
FactSet creates flexible, open data and software solutions for tens of thousands of investment professionals around the world, providing instant access to financial data and analytics that investors use to make crucial decisions. For 40 years, through market changes and technological progress, our
XP Inc.
A XP Inc. é uma das maiores instituições financeiras independente do Brasil, dona das marcas XP, Rico, Clear, XP Educação, InfoMoney, entre outras. Com mais de 4,6 milhões de clientes ativos e um valor superior a R$ 1,1 trilhão de ativos sob custódia, há 23 anos vem transformando o mercado financeir
BBVA en México
Bienvenido a la página oficial del Banco BBVA Bancomer. Institución financiera de México desde 1932. Es una empresa filial de Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA), uno de los grupos financieros líderes en Europa y considerado entre uno de los más grandes de la Zona Euro. El Grupo trabaja por un f
Northwestern Mutual
Northwestern Mutual is here for what’s most important—helping families and businesses experience the freedom of financial security for over 160 years. Through our personalized, holistic approach, including both insurance and investments, we’re helping people make the most of life today, and for days
Chase
At Chase, we’re dedicated to helping you succeed. Whether you’re in need of banking, credit cards, mortgages, auto financing, investment guidance, small business support, or payment solutions, we’re beside you every step of the way. For customer service, contact us via chase.com/customerservice. S
.png)
Checkout.com CyberSecurity News
November 19, 2025 03:32 PM
Weekly Cyber Threat Intelligence Report | Crowe UAE
The cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve at unprecedented speed, with new vulnerabilities, data breaches, and threat actor activities...
November 17, 2025 10:09 PM
Checkout.com Defies ShinyHunters: Donates Ransom to Cyber Research Amid Legacy Breach
In a defiant move against cyber extortion, London-based payment processor Checkout.com has refused to pay hackers from the notorious...
November 16, 2025 08:00 AM
Checkout.com Data Breach Exposes Old Merchant Files
According to early findings, the Checkout.com data breach occurred when ShinyHunters accessed a legacy storage system last used in 2020.
November 15, 2025 03:50 PM
Defying Hackers: Checkout.com’s Bold Stand Against Ransomware
In a striking rebuke to cybercriminals, Checkout.com's chief technology officer has turned a ransomware attack into an opportunity for...
November 14, 2025 11:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: Cyber laws reprieved, Microsoft screen capture, FBI highlights Akira
Cyber laws are back as shutdown bill signed, Microsoft launches screen capture prevention for Teams, FBI calls Akira top five ransomware.
November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Checkout.com Breach: ShinyHunters Hack Cloud Storage, Ransom Demand Rejected
Payment processor Checkout.com has disclosed a significant data breach following a targeted attack by the notorious cybercrime group...
November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
ShinyHunters Compromises Legacy Cloud Storage System of Checkout.com
The threat group accessed a poorly decommissioned third-party system last used by the company in 2020 but that still contained merchant...
November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Checkout.com Suffers Data Breach as ShinyHunters Attack Cloud Storage
Payment processor Checkout.com recently experienced a data breach after being targeted by the cybercrime group “ShinyHunters.”
November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Checkout.com snubs hackers after data breach, to donate ransom instead
UK financial technology company Checkout announced that the ShinyHunters threat group has breached one of its legacy cloud storage systems...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Checkout.com CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Checkout.com
The official website of Checkout.com is https://www.checkout.com.
Checkout.com’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 630, reflecting their Poor security posture.
How many security badges does Checkout.com’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Checkout.com have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Checkout.com have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Checkout.com comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Checkout.com have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Checkout.com comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Checkout.com is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Checkout.com have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Checkout.com is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Checkout.com
Checkout.com operates primarily in the Financial Services industry.
Number of Employees at Checkout.com
Checkout.com employs approximately 2,214 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Checkout.com
Checkout.com presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Checkout.com’s LinkedIn Followers
Checkout.com’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 262,397 followers.
NAICS Classification of Checkout.com
Checkout.com is classified under the NAICS code 52, which corresponds to Finance and Insurance.
Checkout.com’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Checkout.com has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/checkout-com.
Checkout.com’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Checkout.com maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/checkout.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Checkout.com
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Checkout.com has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Checkout.com has an estimated 29,912 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Checkout.com ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.
How does Checkout.com detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with contacting impacted customers, remediation measures with coordinating with regulators, and communication strategy with public apology by cto, communication strategy with transparency in disclosure, communication strategy with donation to cybersecurity research centers, and and remediation measures with donated ransom amount to cybercrime research (carnegie mellon university, university of oxford), and communication strategy with public denial of ransom payment via the register..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Checkout.com Ransomware Extortion Attempt by ShinyHunters (November 2025)
Description: Checkout.com was targeted by a digital extortion attempt by the threat actor group ShinyHunters in November 2025. Attackers accessed a legacy third-party cloud file storage system that had not been properly decommissioned, exposing internal operation documents and merchant onboarding materials from 2020 and earlier. The company refused to pay the ransom, opting instead to donate the demanded amount to Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Oxford Cyber Security Center. Live payment processing systems, merchant funds, and card numbers were not compromised.
Date Detected: 2025-11-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-01
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: legacy third-party cloud file storage system (improperly decommissioned)
Vulnerability Exploited: improper decommissioning of legacy cloud storage
Threat Actor: ShinyHunters
Motivation: financial extortion
Title: Checkout.com Ransomware Incident by ShinyHunters (2025)
Description: UK-based payment services provider Checkout.com experienced a compromise of its legacy third-party cloud file storage system by the ShinyHunters extortion group. Instead of paying the ransom, Checkout.com donated the demanded amount to Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Oxford Cyber Security Center for cybercrime research.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-14
Type: ransomware
Attack Vector: compromised legacy third-party cloud file storage
Threat Actor: ShinyHunters
Motivation: financial gainextortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through legacy third-party cloud file storage system and legacy third-party cloud file storage.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Data Compromised: Internal operation documents, Merchant onboarding materials (pre-2021)
Systems Affected: legacy third-party cloud file storage
Downtime: none (live payment processing systems unaffected)
Operational Impact: limited (less than 25% of current merchant base affected)
Brand Reputation Impact: positive (praised for transparency and refusal to pay ransom)
Identity Theft Risk: none (no card numbers or merchant funds accessed)
Payment Information Risk: none
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Systems Affected: legacy third-party cloud file storage
Brand Reputation Impact: potential negative impact (public disclosure of breach)
Payment Information Risk: potential (payment services provider)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Internal Operation Documents, Merchant Onboarding Materials and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Entity Name: Checkout.com
Entity Type: payment processing company
Industry: fintech
Customers Affected: less than 25% of current merchant base
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Entity Name: Checkout.com
Entity Type: payment services provider
Industry: financial services (payments)
Location: United Kingdom
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: contacting impacted customerscoordinating with regulators
Communication Strategy: public apology by CTOtransparency in disclosuredonation to cybersecurity research centers
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: donated ransom amount to cybercrime research (Carnegie Mellon University, University of Oxford)
Communication Strategy: public denial of ransom payment via The Register
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Type of Data Compromised: Internal operation documents, Merchant onboarding materials
Sensitivity of Data: moderate (historical operational and onboarding data)
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: contacting impacted customers, coordinating with regulators, , donated ransom amount to cybercrime research (Carnegie Mellon University, University of Oxford), .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Lessons Learned: Importance of proper decommissioning of legacy systems, transparency in incident response, and refusal to fund criminal activity through ransom payments.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Recommendations: ensure thorough decommissioning of legacy systems, invest in cybersecurity research and collaboration with academic institutions, maintain transparency with stakeholders during incidentsensure thorough decommissioning of legacy systems, invest in cybersecurity research and collaboration with academic institutions, maintain transparency with stakeholders during incidentsensure thorough decommissioning of legacy systems, invest in cybersecurity research and collaboration with academic institutions, maintain transparency with stakeholders during incidents
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Importance of proper decommissioning of legacy systems, transparency in incident response, and refusal to fund criminal activity through ransom payments.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Source: TechRadar
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: TechRadar, and Source: The RegisterDate Accessed: 2025-11-14.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Investigation Status: ongoing (coordinating with law enforcement and regulators)
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Investigation Status: ongoing (implied by public disclosure)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Apology By Cto, Transparency In Disclosure, Donation To Cybersecurity Research Centers and Public Denial Of Ransom Payment Via The Register.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Statement By Cto Mariano Albera, Contacting Impacted Merchants.
Customer Advisories: notifications to affected merchants
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Statement By Cto Mariano Albera, Contacting Impacted Merchants, Notifications To Affected Merchants and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Entry Point: legacy third-party cloud file storage system
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Entry Point: Legacy Third-Party Cloud File Storage,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : data breach CHE3702137111525
Root Causes: Improper Decommissioning Of Legacy Cloud Storage, Oversight In Third-Party System Management,
Corrective Actions: Donation To Cybersecurity Research, Enhanced Coordination With Law Enforcement And Regulators,
Incident : ransomware CHE5363553111725
Root Causes: Compromise Of Legacy Third-Party Cloud Storage,
Corrective Actions: Donation To Cybercrime Research Instead Of Ransom Payment,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Donation To Cybersecurity Research, Enhanced Coordination With Law Enforcement And Regulators, , Donation To Cybercrime Research Instead Of Ransom Payment, .
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was True.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an ShinyHunters and ShinyHunters.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-11-01.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-11-14.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were internal operation documents, merchant onboarding materials (pre-2021), and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was legacy third-party cloud file storage and legacy third-party cloud file storage.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were internal operation documents and merchant onboarding materials (pre-2021).
Ransomware Information
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Importance of proper decommissioning of legacy systems, transparency in incident response, and refusal to fund criminal activity through ransom payments.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was ensure thorough decommissioning of legacy systems, maintain transparency with stakeholders during incidents and invest in cybersecurity research and collaboration with academic institutions.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are TechRadar and The Register.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ongoing (coordinating with law enforcement and regulators).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was public statement by CTO Mariano Albera, contacting impacted merchants, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an notifications to affected merchants.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an legacy third-party cloud file storage system.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was improper decommissioning of legacy cloud storageoversight in third-party system management, compromise of legacy third-party cloud storage.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was donation to cybersecurity researchenhanced coordination with law enforcement and regulators, donation to cybercrime research instead of ransom payment.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=checkout' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
