Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Charter Steel » CHA1780590686

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CHA1780590686)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-156
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident603 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCHA1780590686
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORVoice Phishing (Vishing)
DATA EXPOSEDCustomer names, emails, home addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Charter Steel's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Charter Steel Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Charter Steel breach identified under incident ID CHA1780590686.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Charter Steel's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/charter-steel, the number of followers: 16807, the industry type: Mining and the number of employees: 698 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 603 with a difference of -156 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Charter Steel and their customers.

On 01 April 2026, Charter Communications (Spectrum) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Charter Communications Hit by ShinyHunters Ransomware Attack, Customer Data at Risk".

Charter Communications, the parent company of Spectrum, confirmed a cybersecurity incident after the ransomware group ShinyHunters listed it on a data leak site.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Salesforce system, Microsoft Entra account, sales tools for business customers, and exposing Customer names, emails, home addresses, phone numbers, device types, service plan details, support ticket data, private telecom account information, with nearly Millions (alleged) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public acknowledgment of the incident, dispute of ShinyHunters' claims.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Need for enhanced employee training on phone-based scams (vishing) and stronger access controls for cloud-based business tools like Salesforce and Microsoft Entra, and recommending next steps like Customers advised to remain vigilant against potential follow-up scams leveraging leaked data. Organizations should implement stricter access controls and monitoring for cloud-based systems, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Customers advised to remain vigilant against phishing scams.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Vishing (T1566.004) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including attack occurred via a voice phishing (vishing) scam, and impersonated IT support to gain access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating gain access to an employee’s Microsoft Entra account (implied) and Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication (T1556.006) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating microsoft Entra account compromised (potential MFA bypass). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Cloud Services (T1021.007) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating breached Charter’s Salesforce system from Microsoft Entra. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating extract the data from Salesforce system and Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce system data extraction (cloud-based repository). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claims theft of millions of records and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration via cloud-based tools (Salesforce). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (ShinyHunters group) and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating listed on a data leak site (public shaming). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating microsoft Entra account access used to breach Salesforce. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Vishing (90%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication (40%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Cloud Services (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (70%)

Sources & References