Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Change Healthcare » CHA1775773596

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CHA1775773596)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCHA1775773596
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive patient data, including medical...
INCIDENT DATE08/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Change Healthcare's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Change Healthcare Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Change Healthcare breach identified under incident ID CHA1775773596.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Change Healthcare's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/change-healthcare, the number of followers: 147311, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 4617 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Change Healthcare and their customers.

On 21 February 2024, Change Healthcare disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Cyberattack Disrupts Major U.S. Healthcare Network, Exposing Patient Data".

A significant cyberattack targeted Change Healthcare, a key subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, in late February 2024, causing widespread disruptions across the U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Claims processing, prescription fulfillment, payment operations, and exposing Sensitive patient data, including medical records and personal information.

In response, while recovery efforts such as Ongoing recovery efforts to restore systems continue.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack targeted Change Healthcare, a key subsidiary with critical systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruptions suggest possible compromised credentials. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encrypted critical systems, halting operations. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing disruptions imply sustained access to systems. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating encryption of critical systems suggests elevated privileges. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encrypted critical systems (BlackCat/ALPHV) and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strain (BlackCat/ALPHV) known for obfuscation. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruptions imply possible credential theft. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating medical records and personal information targeted for exfiltration. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive patient data, including medical records, compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating possible data exfiltration of medical records and personal information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encrypted critical systems, halting operations and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruptions and manual processes required. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (50%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement (40%)

Sources & References