Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CenturyLink BusinessCenturyLink Business
VS
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
CenturyLink Business

CenturyLink Business

100 Centurylink Drive, None, Monroe, Louisiana, US, 71203

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

We are an innovative telecommunications company with a nationwide footprint and a passion for empowering the small businesses that power the communities we serve. And because businesses come in many shapes and sizes, our solutions do, too. Visit our website to learn mo...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:1,147
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Avenida Eng. Luís Carlos Berrini, 1376, São Paulo, 04571 - 000, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vivo.com.br
800/1000Good

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of p...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:38,994
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CenturyLink Business

CenturyLink Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CenturyLink Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CenturyLink Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CenturyLink Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CenturyLink Business

CenturyLink Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CenturyLink Business company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CenturyLink Business and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CenturyLink Business and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CenturyLink Business or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CenturyLink Business or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Between CenturyLink Business and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CenturyLink Business and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1