Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CEN1775760245)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of CentroNía's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts CentroNía Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the CentroNía breach identified under incident ID CEN1775760245.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of CentroNía's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/centronia, the number of followers: 1327, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 151 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 698 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on CentroNía and their customers.
On 06 July 2025, CentroNía disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "CentroNía Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information of D.C. Community Members".
A cybersecurity incident at CentroNía, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, has exposed the sensitive personal data of individuals served by the organization.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII).
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified potentially affected individuals.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notified potentially affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed CentroNía’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating accessed CentroNía’s network (no specific vector mentioned). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating accessed files containing PII (implies credential misuse) and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and financial data compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing PII were viewed and exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating medical, financial, and government ID data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in breach details and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no specific exfiltration method mentioned. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but PII exposed and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk noted in impact assessment. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- CentroNía Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/centronia/incident/CEN1775760245
- CentroNía CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/centronia
- CentroNía Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/cen1775760245-centrona-breach-june-2025/
- CentroNía CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/centronia/history
- CentroNía CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/centronia-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf