What is the official website of Central Contra Costa Transit Authority ?

The official website of Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is https://countyconnection.com.

What is Central Contra Costa Transit Authority's cybersecurity risk score?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 691 out of 1000, indicating a Weak security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Central Contra Costa Transit Authority experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Central Contra Costa Transit Authority been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority operate in ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority operates primarily in the Ground Passenger Transportation industry.

How many employees does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority employs approximately 44 people worldwide.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority own any subsidiaries ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 228 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Central Contra Costa Transit Authority ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority is classified under the NAICS code 485, which corresponds to Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Central Contra Costa Transit Authority maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/central-contra-costa-transit-authority.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Central Contra Costa Transit Authority experienced ?

As of July 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Central Contra Costa Transit Authority has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Central Contra Costa Transit Authority have ?

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority has an estimated 162 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Central Contra Costa Transit Authority faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

CCCTA

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

691

/1000

Weak

716

/1000

Moderate

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

countyconnection.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

County Connection was formed in 1980 as a Joint Powers Agency under the legal name The Central Contra Costa Transit Authority. Today County Connection provides fixed-route and paratransit bus service throughout the communities of Concord, Pleasant Hill, Martinez, Walnut Creek, Clayton, Lafayette, Orinda, Moraga, Danville, San Ramon, as well as unincorporated communities in Central Contra Costa County.

CCCTA A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

CCCTA

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Central Contra Cost...

Breach

5/2024

CEN259072825

Central Contra Cost...

Breach

8/2021

CEN948080425

Loading…

A.I.

CCCTA Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for CCCTA

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Contra Costa Transit Authority in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Contra Costa Transit Authority in 2026.

Incident Types CCCTA vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Contra Costa Transit Authority in 2026.

Incident History - CCCTA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority Subsidiaries

Parent Company

CCCTA

Ground Passenger Transportation

Website: https://countyconnection.com

Company Size: 44

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority Similar Companies

Lyft

lyft.com

Whether it’s an everyday commute or a journey that changes everything, Lyft is driven by our purpose: to serve and connect. In 2012, Lyft was founded as one of the first ridesharing communities in the United States. Now, millions of drivers have chosen to earn on billions of rides. Lyft offers rideshare, bikes, and scooters all in one app — for a more connected world, with transportation for everyone.

Loading…

NEWS

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

May 17, 2024 07:00 AM

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority experiences cyber security data breach

County Connection, a bus service and paratransit operator in Contra Costa County, shared the discovery of a recent cybersecurity attack on Friday.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-67595

SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

Published

Date2026-07-29

Updated

Date2026-07-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 9.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-15157

SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

Published

Date2026-07-29

Updated

Date2026-07-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14643

SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

Published

Date2026-07-29

Updated

Date2026-07-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-69949

SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in check_availability.php via the parameters emailid and email.

Published

Date2026-07-29

Updated

Date2026-07-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-69945

SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

Published

Date2026-07-29

Updated

Date2026-07-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/um-dsp/TaintRadar/blob/main/sql_injection_cves/hospitalmanagementsystemproject/20250811-hospital-management-system-edit-patient.php-editid-sqli/20250811-hospital-management-system-edit-patient.php-editid-sqli.md

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…