Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » CenterWell » HUMORAHEACEN1774290394

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HUMORAHEACEN1774290394)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-117
Company Score Before Incident772 / 1000
Company Score After Incident655 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHUMORAHEACEN1774290394
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORVendor’s software vulnerability
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and medical information
INCIDENT DATE31/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of CenterWell's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts CenterWell Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the CenterWell breach identified under incident ID HUMORAHEACEN1774290394.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of CenterWell's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/centerwell, the number of followers: 6376, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 5443 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 772 and after the incident was 655 with a difference of -117 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on CenterWell and their customers.

Humana recently reported "Humana and Centerwell Hit by Clop Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Humana confirmed a data breach in August 2025, exposing sensitive personal and medical information of an undisclosed number of individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal and medical information, with nearly Undisclosed (4,618 Texas residents confirmed) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 24 months of free credit monitoring and identity restoration services (enrollment deadline: March 31, 2027).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including attack stemmed from a vendor’s software vulnerability, and oracle’s E-Business Suite flaw exploited and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vendor’s software vulnerability (Oracle’s E-Business Suite flaw). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating oracle’s E-Business Suite flaw exploited (implied access to sensitive data). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, medical billing details, claims info compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating health insurance data, Humana ID numbers, patient account numbers exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including clop typically steals data without encryption, and data exfiltration confirmed and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clop ransomware group claimed responsibility for data theft. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating clop claimed responsibility (public leak threats common) and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including motivation such as Financial gain (ransom demand), and class-action lawsuit alleging inadequate data protection. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1066) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clop specializes in zero-day exploits (implied evasion of detection) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating vendor’s software vulnerability exploited (potential misconfiguration). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Defacement (50%)
Financial Theft (70%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)