Comparison Overview
Censis Technologies, Inc.

Censis Technologies, Inc.
4031 Aspen Grove Dr, Suite 350, Franklin, Tennessee, US, 37067
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Censis Technologies is an innovative software company that specializes in surgical instrument inventory management. We focus on supporting the perioperative loop, from sterile processing to the operating room. Our cloud-based solutions aid customers in maintaining patie...

Houston Methodist
6565 Fannin St, Houston, 77030, US
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Houston Methodist is one of the nation’s leading health systems and academic medical centers. The health system consists of eight hospitals: Houston Methodist Hospital, its flagship academic hospital in the Texas Medical Center, seven community hospitals and one long-te...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Censis Technologies, Inc.







Houston Methodist






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Censis Technologies, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Houston Methodist has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Censis Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Censis Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Houston Methodist (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Houston Methodist cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Censis Technologies, Inc.

Houston Methodist
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.