Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CED1773247866)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Cedar Valley Services's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Cedar Valley Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cedar Valley Services breach identified under incident ID CED1773247866.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cedar Valley Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cedar-valley-services, the number of followers: 42, the industry type: Truck Transportation and the number of employees: 66 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 654 with a difference of -103 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cedar Valley Services and their customers.
On 21 December 2025, Cedar Valley Services disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Cedar Valley Services Hit by Qilin Ransomware Attack, Exposing Sensitive Data".
On February 13, 2026, Cedar Valley Services, a Southern Minnesota-based nonprofit, reported a ransomware attack to the U.S.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), Protected health information (PHI).
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like System isolation (assumed).
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector and vulnerability exploited not specified and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare-adjacent nonprofit, likely trusted connections. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack attributed to Qilin group. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware likely maintains persistence for encryption. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to PII/PHI suggests compromised credentials. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strain Qilin known for obfuscation and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating system isolation assumed as containment measure. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII/PHI accessed, likely via credential compromise. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data (PII/PHI) targeted, implies discovery phase. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pII/PHI compromised, including names, addresses, SSNs. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin group claimed data exfiltration via Tor network. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack, data encryption implied. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Cedar Valley Services Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cedar-valley-services/incident/CED1773247866
- Cedar Valley Services CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cedar-valley-services
- Cedar Valley Services Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ced1773247866-cedar-valley-services-ransomware-february-2026/
- Cedar Valley Services CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cedar-valley-services/history
- Cedar Valley Services CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/cedar-valley-services-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf