Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CBM1767807505)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of CBMM's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts CBMM Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the CBMM breach identified under incident ID CBM1767807505.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of CBMM's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cbmm, the number of followers: 165295, the industry type: Primary Metal Manufacturing and the number of employees: 1966 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 713 with a difference of -54 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on CBMM and their customers.
On 30 December 2025, CBMM disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "CBMM Data Breach".
CBMM reported a data breach where sensitive personal identifiable information may have been compromised.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal identifiable information.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Mailed data breach notification letters to impacted individuals.
The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Provided complimentary credit monitoring services and a list of specific types of sensitive information impacted.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive personal information may have occurred and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detected suspicious activity within its systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party accessed and potentially acquired personal data and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and financial account details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed names, Social Security numbers, and financial account information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party accessed and potentially acquired personal data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting sensitive personal information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal identifiable information may have been compromised and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems between August 8 and August 9, 2024. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- CBMM Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cbmm/incident/CBM1767807505
- CBMM CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cbmm
- CBMM Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/cbm1767807505-breach-august-2024/
- CBMM CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cbmm/history
- CBMM CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://straussborrelli.com/2026/01/07/chesapeake-bay-maritime-museum-data-breach-investigation/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf