Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carousell GroupCarousell Group
VS
WorkdayWorkday
Carousell Group

Carousell Group

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
698/1000Weak

Carousell Group is the leading multi-category platform for secondhand in Greater Southeast Asia on a mission to make secondhand the first choice. Founded in Singapore by Siu Rui, Marcus and Lucas back in August 2012, the Group operates across seven key markets under t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,218
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Workday

Workday

6110 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Pleasanton, California, US, 94588

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.workday.com
656/1000Weak

Workday is a leading provider of enterprise cloud applications for finance and human resources, helping customers adapt and thrive in a changing world. Workday applications for financial management, human resources, planning, spend management, and analytics are built wi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:26,861
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carousell Group

Carousell Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workday

Workday

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carousell Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Workday has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Carousell Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carousell Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workday (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workday cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carousell Group

Carousell Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR1831122
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
CAR21412323
Workday

Workday

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WORNOTGOOZOONIKTIN1777868873
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAL2862828092525
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOR1768679649

FAQ

Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carousell Group company and Workday company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carousell Group and Workday, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carousell Group and Workday, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carousell Group or Workday ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carousell Group or Workday ?
Between Carousell Group and Workday, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carousell Group and Workday, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA