Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cardinal Services, Inc. » PRECAR1780605234

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRECAR1780605234)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident697 / 1000
Company LinkView Cardinal Services, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERPRECAR1780605234
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal data, including names,...
INCIDENT DATE31/05/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cardinal Services, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cardinal Services, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cardinal Services, Inc. breach identified under incident ID PRECAR1780605234.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cardinal Services, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cardinalservices, the number of followers: 1644, the industry type: Human Resources and the number of employees: 137 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 697 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cardinal Services, Inc. and their customers.

Cardinal Services recently reported "Cardinal Services Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A data breach affecting individuals associated with Cardinal Services, Cardinal Employer Organization, and Preferred Employer Solutions resulted in the theft of sensitive personal data, including names, financial account information, and Social Security numbers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal data, including names, financial account information, and Social Security numbers.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Breach notifications sent to impacted individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Impacted individuals advised to monitor for unauthorized transactions or identity theft.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data...may have resulted in the theft and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting individuals associated with Cardinal Services. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating financial account information and Social Security numbers compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating names, financial account information, and Social Security numbers stolen. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data...including names, financial account information and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting individuals associated with Cardinal Services. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data may be circulating on the dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes (circulating on the dark web). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data...resulted in the theft and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized transactions or identity theft risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Stored Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References