Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank » CAP1764796594

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAP1764796594)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-142
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident614 / 1000
Company LinkView The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCAP1764796594
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendor compromise (SonicWall firewall)
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE02/12/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank breach identified under incident ID CAP1764796594.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cape-cod-five-cents-savings-bank, the number of followers: 5433, the industry type: Banking and the number of employees: 509 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 614 with a difference of -142 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank and their customers.

On 14 August 2025, Cape Cod Five disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cape Cod Five Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor (Marquis Software Solutions)".

A significant data breach involving Cape Cod Five was discovered after Marquis Software Solutions Inc., a third-party digital and physical marketing vendor, detected suspicious activity on its network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Marquis Software Solutions' network, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), with nearly At least 974 (Maine residents only) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party gaining access through its SonicWall firewall and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party digital and physical marketing vendor (Marquis). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sonicWall firewall vulnerability exploited (implied brute force). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating victim of a ransomware attack and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (potential defacement not confirmed). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files...potentially accessed and acquired by the attackers and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration (implied in ransomware attack). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access through SonicWall firewall (potential valid account misuse) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (implied defense impairment). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References