Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Canvas » CAN1778632804

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAN1778632804)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-105
Company Score Before Incident771 / 1000
Company Score After Incident666 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCAN1778632804
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE25/03/2024
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Canvas's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Canvas Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Canvas breach identified under incident ID CAN1778632804.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Canvas's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/canvas, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Blogs and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 771 and after the incident was 666 with a difference of -105 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Canvas and their customers.

On 12 May 2026, Canvas (Instructure) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Global Canvas Data Breach Disrupts Student Exams".

A major data breach involving Canvas, a widely used learning management system (LMS), has impacted students worldwide, causing significant disruptions during critical academic periods, including final exams.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Canvas LMS platform.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including exposed vulnerabilities in the platform, and canvas LMS platform affected and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including widely used learning management system (LMS), and disrupted access to course materials. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating widespread chaos as students struggled to access course materials and Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted access to course materials, assignments, and exams. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including major data breach involving Canvas, and impacted students worldwide. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no immediate details on the scope of compromised data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
External Remote Services (70%)
Impact
Defacement (60%)
Service Stop (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (40%)

Sources & References